[warzone2100-dev] [Warzone 2100 Trac] #2292: Building 3 gates in an L shape crashes

2010-11-03 Thread Warzone 2100 Trac
#2292: Building 3 gates in an L shape crashes +- Reporter: Cyp| Owner: Type: bug|Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: unspecified Component: other | Version:

[warzone2100-dev] [Warzone 2100 Trac] #2293: Some maps crash when starting game and scrolling a bit

2010-11-03 Thread Warzone 2100 Trac
#2293: Some maps crash when starting game and scrolling a bit +- Reporter: Cyp| Owner: Type: bug|Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: unspecified Component: other |

[warzone2100-dev] The gitorious repo sucks because it's missing history

2010-11-03 Thread Christian Ohm
The git repo on gitorious doesn't have all the history from svn, which makes it somewhat painful to retrace old changes. My local git-svn repo was way better in that regard. Is there a way to redo the repo from svn, doctor the transition from old to new svn (berlios to gna) to give continuous

[warzone2100-dev] [Warzone 2100 Trac] #2294: Units turn to green color wreck

2010-11-03 Thread Warzone 2100 Trac
#2294: Units turn to green color wreck +-- Reporter: |Type: bug j0shdrunk0nwar|Priority: minor Status: new | Component: Engine: Graphics

Re: [warzone2100-dev] The gitorious repo sucks because it's missing history

2010-11-03 Thread dak180
On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Christian Ohm wrote: he git repo on gitorious doesn't have all the history from svn, which makes it somewhat painful to retrace old changes. My local git-svn repo was way better in that regard. Is there a way to redo the repo from svn, doctor the transition from

Re: [warzone2100-dev] The gitorious repo sucks because it's missing history

2010-11-03 Thread Christian Ohm
On Wednesday, 3 November 2010 at 12:46, dak180 wrote: This is git, (so in keeping with git=MacGyver) there is a way (perhaps even more than one); the real question is what is the cost of doing so and is the outcome worth that cost? If it's possible, I'll do the doctoring, so the cost is

Re: [warzone2100-dev] The gitorious repo sucks because it's missing history

2010-11-03 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
How much lost history are we talking about here? - Per ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Re: [warzone2100-dev] The gitorious repo sucks because it's missing history

2010-11-03 Thread buginator
On 11/3/10, Christian Ohm wrote: On Wednesday, 3 November 2010 at 18:22, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: How much lost history are we talking about here? Almost everything in the svn tags, i.e. the stuff we actually released, and its branch points. I only see 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 2.3.4, 2.3.5, 3.0-beta1