Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[11489] branches/2.3/src/configuration.c

2010-08-17 Thread Guangcong Luo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:37 PM, buginator wrote: > The reason I picked 1x instead of the other options is, that people > would then actually look at the menu options, and pick the one they > want.  While 2x is better than FS, it still looks blocky/crappy at > high resolutions ...

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[11489] branches/2.3/src/configuration.c

2010-08-17 Thread buginator
On 8/17/10, Guangcong Luo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 wrote: >> Change FMVs to be 1x for default instead of full screen. >> At higher resolutions, the FMVs are just too blocky. >> >> 1X is native, which has the best image quality on the 320x200 source FMVs. > > Isn't this overkill? > > I mean,

Re: [warzone2100-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[11489] branches/2.3/src/configuration.c

2010-08-16 Thread Guangcong Luo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010  wrote: > Change FMVs to be 1x for default instead of full screen. > At higher resolutions, the FMVs are just too blocky. > > 1X is native, which has the best image quality on the 320x200 source FMVs. Isn't this overkill? I mean, on a modern screen, 320x240 (which is, btw, th