Hi,
First of all, Happy New Year to you all !
Now I guess I have to answer this...
When I ported that sound code to OpenAL, I first tried to use the
parameters you mentionned (for position, attenuation model etc.).
Problem was the attenuation didn't sound good (I tested with all
models). It
On 1/7/07, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway if nobody objects (yes, read that in your opinion the sound code
isn't crappy, no specifics however, so if you object please clarify),
I'll create a (temporary(?)) branch somewhere tomorrow (i.e. after 1300
CET, cause I won't be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Hi,
First of all, Happy New Year to you all !
Same to you and every one else ;-)
Now I guess I have to answer this...
When I ported that sound code to OpenAL, I first tried to use the
parameters you mentionned (for position, attenuation model etc.).
Problem
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
On 1/7/07, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway if nobody objects (yes, read that in your opinion the sound code
isn't crappy, no specifics however, so if you object please clarify),
I'll create a (temporary(?)) branch somewhere tomorrow (i.e. after
On 1/7/07, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the problem with a local tree would be that I would only be able to
commit anything but incremental changes without breaking things (i.e.
without breaking the trunk).
Maybe I should not use the word 'tree'. What I mean is another
