On Sunday, 12 November 2006 at 14:01, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2006 15:03 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Sunday, 1 October 2006 at 13:44, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 01:19 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I think I got something here... hangs at
Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2006 15:03 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Sunday, 1 October 2006 at 13:44, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 01:19 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I think I got something here... hangs at aiexperience.c again (-j2 this
time), with no other error message, the
Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 01:19 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I think I got something here... hangs at aiexperience.c again (-j2 this
time), with no other error message, the traceback occurred a few files
before aiexperience.c (which, incidentally, is the last file to be
compiled), I guess with
On Sunday, 1 October 2006 at 13:44, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 01:19 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I think I got something here... hangs at aiexperience.c again (-j2 this
time), with no other error message, the traceback occurred a few files
before aiexperience.c
Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2006 00:45 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Friday, 29 September 2006 at 1:19, Christian Ohm wrote:
Hmm... the big difference I see here is: The waf variants have to be
defined in the wscript, while the autostuff can have any number of
different configurations just by
Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 17:57 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Thursday, 28 September 2006 at 0:31, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 00:18 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
From the waf mailinglist. :)
---
An innocent-looking method in Node.py was causing a
From the waf mailinglist. :)
---
An innocent-looking method in Node.py was causing a
massive slowdown[...]
Others improvements have been made too, and here are
the results so far for the 5050 tasks benchmark (on my
laptop and for targets already built)
* 93 seconds two weeks ago
* 30 seconds
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:05 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I tested waf a bit and it seems to work well. I had some of those can't
link lots of {[]w9r at the beginning, but that didn't occur later (at
the latest with your second version).
When you run waf with --nocache it doesn't seem to
On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 at 22:38, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:05 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I tested waf a bit and it seems to work well. I had some of those can't
link lots of {[]w9r at the beginning, but that didn't occur later (at
the latest with your
