Re: [Warzone-dev] videos / briefings / pause 'bug'?

2006-09-20 Thread Christian Vest Hansen

2006/9/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

We just don't know what as is with no guarantee means in the
legal sense, and if that conflicts with GPL in any way at all?

Is this not also one of the reasons Rodzilla  Grimandmandy 
Charun  Henrivee  Qamly  Kevin  ?? left the project to move on
to their own RTS?

Rodzilla got a new job that he is very happy about, and I think he
just don't have time to follow the project any more.

Qamly has/had a job that kept him away from computers for weeks. He
probably found that it was unstable to be as committed as he was, to a
project like this when you only have one or two weekends a month to
work on it.

Kevin is still Kevin. I haven't noticed any change in activety levels here ;)

I recall hearing something about Grim not wanting to release his
artwork under a GPL compatible license, and if he's not with us any
more, then this could probably be the reason.

I don't recall much about Charun  Henrivee


I really doubt that Eidos/pumpkin (who are now Pivotal)--
http://www.pivotalgames.com/index.php?content=warzonecat=support
care, but I think the new person to contact would be Jim Bambra,
Managing Director Pivotal Games.  They say 'You can contact us at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'  Perhaps we can write up something again,
and see if they can write a new license that is more clear for the
GPL legal people so we can move on?


Give it a shot.
Though I'm skeptic.

--
All good software releases were accidents corrected in the next version.

___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev


Re: [Warzone-dev] videos / briefings / pause 'bug'?

2006-09-20 Thread Christian Ohm
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 19:02, Christian Vest Hansen wrote:
 2006/9/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I really doubt that Eidos/pumpkin (who are now Pivotal)--
 http://www.pivotalgames.com/index.php?content=warzonecat=support
 care, but I think the new person to contact would be Jim Bambra,
 Managing Director Pivotal Games.  They say 'You can contact us at:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]'  Perhaps we can write up something again,
 and see if they can write a new license that is more clear for the
 GPL legal people so we can move on?
 
 Give it a shot.
 Though I'm skeptic.

The question is: Who owns the copyright to Warzone? The README says
Thankyou to Jonathan Kemp of Eidos Europe for permitting the release.
So, at that time, Eidos owned the copyright. Now what happened? Did
Eidos transfer the copyright to the Pumpkin guys, as Virgil said? (They
could have done it, there's no law (yet) that copyrights can only belong
to corporations.) Then those are the ones to ask. I'd guess Pivotal has
no role in that, other than them being employed there. So, asking
Pivotal will only be successful if they actually do know anything about
the Warzone affair. But if they don't, they might start assuming things,
and that's the last thing we need...

-- 
The politician is someone who deals in man's problems of adjustment.
To ask a politician to lead us is to ask the tail of a dog to lead the dog.
-- Buckminster Fuller

___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev


Re: [Warzone-dev] videos / briefings / pause 'bug'?

2006-09-20 Thread Christian Ohm
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:15:26 -0400 Christian Ohm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at  1:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If not OK, then what, fork the SP  MP/skirmish so we don't have to 
  deal with GPL restrictions that make no sense for this game since 
  everything *should* be covered by GPL, but we can never be 100%
  sure, since we can't contact anyone who can tell us?
 
 *BINGBINGBING* Wrong. If there is any doubt about the data's license
 (ie. we are not allowed to redistribute and change it), that will
 affect both the campaign and multiplayer modes, so there's no sense
 separating them. If that is the case (and it is highly unlikely,
 since the intention of the source release was the continued
 development of the game), we can stop the whole project.
 
 You sure about that?  The SP game is the only thing that uses video I
 thought?  The video playback is a thorn for GPL, since it uses non GPL
 content.  The rest of the data can be viewed/used with no special
 codecs or anything else that might break GPL.

Oh, you meant just the videos. I thought you were speaking of the whole
data, because you mentioned the uncertainty around it. The video issue
is crystal clear, we cannot redistribute any of those not included in
the source archive (ie. those that are interesting). The format of the
videos doesn't matter, a GPL program can use data that is not GPL (else
you couldn't use GPL programs for commercial purposes). Just the whole
source code has to be GPL (so until someone writes a GPLed
implementation for the RPL video codec, we cannot play them in the GPLed
Warzone).

What I meant was the whole data. If we are not allowed to modify and
distribute that, this project is over (then there is nothing to
resurrect, just to conserve - and who wants the role of a curator?).

-- 
You will outgrow your usefulness.

___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev


Re: [Warzone-dev] videos / briefings / pause 'bug'?

2006-09-20 Thread vs2k5
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:25:15 -0400 Christian Ohm [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
What I meant was the whole data. If we are not allowed to modify 
and
distribute that, this project is over (then there is nothing to
resurrect, just to conserve - and who wants the role of a 
curator?).

Did this not come up before, or is this more of a issue now since 
more people have found the project, and just the Debian guys are 
the first to ask more questions about the license?

Doing some checking in the logs, to me it seems that there was a 
inadvertent GPL violation for the newer map editor that works with 
a higher color quality (32 bit versus 16bit)  Coyote's hard disk 
crashed or something, and lost the source code.  Does that matter?  
I was reading the GPL FAQ, and it said that if binaries are 
available and released, then the source must be with it. 

Wonder if any member of the warzone community is a lawyer?  Looks 
like we need a international lawyer to deal with this stuff. 








Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account 
required
http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480

Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485


___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev