On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Warzone 2100 Trac
i...@developer.wz2100.net wrote:
#1360: 2.3 beta 6 network code is worse than beta 4
...
The changelog says Fix: Sync improvements. (r8975).
Is that the issue?
I must say that am a little annoyed that this fix was committed to
trunk without
On Wednesday 06 Jan 2010 09:48:13 Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Warzone 2100 Trac
i...@developer.wz2100.net wrote:
#1360: 2.3 beta 6 network code is worse than beta 4
...
The changelog says Fix: Sync improvements. (r8975).
Is that the issue?
I must
On Wednesday, 6 January 2010 at 9:48, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
I would also have liked at least a notice on the mailing list about
beta6 before seeing a surprise announcement on the forum.
Yeah, I guess the beta6 release was a bit too quick, sorry. (I wanted to try
getting rid of the modified
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Per Inge Mathisen
per.mathi...@gmail.com wrote:
I must say that am a little annoyed that this fix was committed to
trunk without review and without discussion, and then backported to a
release branch without discussion, even though it clearly had the
potential
Hi Zarel, hi list!
Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2010 23:44:51 schrieb Guangcong Luo:
Hey, are we talking about the lack of an announcement on the ML, or
are we talking about the lack of declaring an intention to tag ahead
of time? Because I don't remember hearing about beta 5 until _after_ I
saw
