On 1/7/10, Per Inge Mathisen per.xxx...@xx.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:01 AM, dak...@xx.xx.net wrote:
PNG optimization, also known as 'Crush them all!'.
Again?
Did you measure any significant savings from doing this? It is kinda
annoying to have to download every
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:01 AM, dak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
PNG optimization, also known as 'Crush them all!'.
Again?
Did you measure any significant savings from doing this? It is kinda
annoying to have to download every image anew for every working copy,
you know.
- Per
On Thursday, 7 January 2010 at 14:40, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
Did you measure any significant savings from doing this?
find -name \*.png -exec cat '{}' \; | wc -c says 52889643 before vs. 48320543
bytes after.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
Did you measure any significant savings from doing this?
Just slightly under 10MB.
--
My Web Sites:
http://dak180.users.sourceforge.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
