On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:17:27PM -0400, buginator wrote:
> On 9/28/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, buginator wrote:
>>> On 9/27/10, buginator wrote:
It was said that it would be a good idea to get a CVE.
http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html
>>
On 9/28/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, buginator wrote:
>> On 9/27/10, buginator wrote:
>>> It was said that it would be a good idea to get a CVE.
>>> http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html
>>>
>>> Anyone care to chime in on this one way or the other ?
>>>
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, buginator wrote:
> On 9/27/10, buginator wrote:
>> It was said that it would be a good idea to get a CVE.
>> http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html
>>
>> Anyone care to chime in on this one way or the other ?
>>
>
> Since I was just a tad bit too terse... the rea
On 9/27/10, buginator wrote:
> It was said that it would be a good idea to get a CVE.
> http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html
>
> Anyone care to chime in on this one way or the other ?
>
Since I was just a tad bit too terse... the reason for this is:
So we can have some co-ordination with the
