Re: [wtr-general] Re: This must be added into the recent Documentation in WATIR

Thank you Titus! On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 7:47:23 PM UTC+5:30, Titus Fortner wrote: > > That definitely needs to be updated. Watir 6+ makes the use of selenium's > implicit wait functionality completely unnecessary / actively bad for the > reasons you describe. > > > > On Aug 14, 2017

Re: [wtr-general] Re: This must be added into the recent Documentation in WATIR

That definitely needs to be updated. Watir 6+ makes the use of selenium's implicit wait functionality completely unnecessary / actively bad for the reasons you describe. On Aug 14, 2017 9:04 AM, wrote: And other thing I want to point it out here is implicit

[wtr-general] Re: This must be added into the recent Documentation in WATIR

And other thing I want to point it out here is implicit wait. Here you have talked about implicit and explicit wait http://watir.com/docs/waiting/ You have mentioned about the implicit wait here, but this is not implicit wait at all for WATIR, WATIR has nothing to do with implicit wait,