Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Michael MacFadden
Thank, I think I have figured out everything except for my question #1, by debugging the code. Still looking for an answer for that one. I do have a new question. It has been said that the conversation model (specifically the blip documents) are represented as annotated XML documents. I

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Yuri Z
Fantastic MIchael! It would be so great if you could post the questions+answers on the Apache Wave Wiki. On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote: Thank, I think I have figured out everything except for my question #1, by debugging the code. Still

Re: Review Request: Add an extra date formatting category between same day and same year

2012-01-08 Thread Yuri Zelikov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3425/#review4250 --- LGTM after addressing comments by Lennard. - Yuri On 2012-01-08

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Lennard de Rijk
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:17, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Fantastic MIchael! It would be so great if you could post the questions+answers on the Apache Wave Wiki. I agree, we should put some effort into documenting vital knowledge about Wave that currently resides with the original

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Torben Weis
Hi Michael, I have once implemented Wave OT, so I hope I can be of some help. You mentioned that question 1 is till open to you: 1) In order to compose operations I assume they don't have to have the same document width (how could they for successive inserts for example), but I assume they

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Yuri Z
From http://www.codecommit.com/blog/java/understanding-and-applying-operational-transformation We do however want to retain() over the remainder of the document, seeing as we don’t need to do anything else. On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Torben Weis torben.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Michael,

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Michael MacFadden
RIght it seems like you could just imply the last retain if it's not there. However the convention of adding the last retail isn't necessarily bad in the case that you want to verify the document is of the correct length. I suppose retain was a little confusing at first, since I am familiar

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Torben Weis
RIght it seems like you could just imply the last retain if it's not there.   However the convention of adding the last retail isn't necessarily bad in the case that you want to verify the document is of the correct length. I suppose retain was a little confusing at first, since I am

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread David Hearnden
Hi Michael, I can answer that new question quickly. If you're looking for an object model that has the same structure as a DOM (i.e., element nodes, text nodes, etc), then you won't find it on the server. Saying that the documents are annotated XML is an abstract description that conveys the

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Michael MacFadden
David, Again thanks. One more question from this set of answers. In your descriptions you mention the OT v3 protocol, along with the possibility of having more than one operations in flight as well as NACKS. None of these concepts seem to exist in WiaB. Is this something that was

Re: Wave OT / CC Call for Help

2012-01-08 Thread Torben Weis
Hi Michael, as far as I know, annotated XML is a wave specific thing. The reason is that given pHello bMichael/b and bDavid/b/p there is no Wave-OT way of wrapping it all in b, i.e. pHello bMichael and David/b/p without removing Michael and David and inserting it elsewhere. This becomes a