Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
It appears that Walkaround takes a snapshot and imports that, rather than processing the deltas, if I'm reading it correctly. On 2011-12-13 17:39, Yuri Z wrote: You look how Walkaround handles the import. For example

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-14 Thread Ali Lown
That is the same conclusion I reached from looking at it when it was first mentioned on this list. This has the advantage of being quick for a one-time feature, but loses the flexibility of processing all the raw deltas instead. On Dec 14, 2011 3:24 PM, Thomas Leonard

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-14 Thread Yuri Z
What are possible advantages of building the wavelet from deltas? Anyway, I think you can also look how WIAB reads the deltas from files at https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/persistence specifically - FileDeltaCollection.readAppliedDelta On Wed, Dec 14,

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-14 Thread Christian Ohler
Walkaround's import feature currently indeed constructs a short fake history rather than importing each delta. The reasons for this are: * Google Wave's APIs do not allow exporting deltas for user data wavelets (read/unread/folder/archived information). For these, the snapshot is all you get.

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-13 Thread Yuri Z
You look how Walkaround handles the import. For example http://code.google.com/p/walkaround/source/browse/src/com/google/walkaround/wave/server/googleimport/conversion/WaveletHistoryConverter.java and other classed in the package/package above On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Leonard

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
Is an import feature likely to appear before wave.google.com becomes read-only? Import to Walkaround seems to work (though it would take a long time to import all our waves by clicking all the import buttons), but we'd prefer to import into a local WIAB instance, if possible. Thanks, On

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-07 Thread Yuri Z
I would advice to import them to a Walkaround instance just to be sure your waves are safe. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Thomas Leonard t...@it-innovation.soton.ac.uk wrote: Is an import feature likely to appear before wave.google.com becomes read-only? Import to Walkaround seems to work

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-12-07 Thread Ali Lown
I have an instance running at http://wiabexport.appspot.com which I wrote a while ago. This uses the python interface to pull out the wavelet raw deltas and offers them for download to you. I never finished a script to convert to the delta/index file format used by WIAB - due to the lack of

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread Ali Lown
such as...? On 18 May 2011 23:49, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, and some more things too. 2011/5/19 Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro zmy...@gmail.com IMHO better wave persistence and storage are needed before we should consider mass importing from Gwave. --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro On Wed,

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread Yuri Z
Like scalability. No point to let everybody to import a lot of waves into WIAB server only to discover it's just too much for one machine to handle. 2011/5/19 Ali Lown a...@lown.me.uk such as...? On 18 May 2011 23:49, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, and some more things too.

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread Ali Lown
Offtopic: Has anyone tested what 1 machine can handle in terms of waves/users using WIAB? Besides, I am only interested in having a very small (10 user) WIAB system, so that wouldn't affect me, I just want to be able to import my existing waves. I have setup: wiabexport.appspot.com that

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread STenyaK
IMO, if wave import development is parallelizable with the rest of tasks, I see no reason to forcibly block it, or to prevent any newcomer from doing it. While I agree that the most common case (that is, each of us importing our Google Wave history into waveinabox.net) makes makes no sense,

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread Yuri Z
Currently ~5 Online users/~700 waves would cause the server to become really slow (on c1.medium Amazon EC2 machine). The main reason for such poor performance is the current implementation of search functionality. We are currently working on a patch to improve it though. I think that after fixing

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-19 Thread Yuri Z
No one is blocking or preventing. It just that someone should write some user friendly import tool. 2011/5/19 STenyaK sten...@gmail.com IMO, if wave import development is parallelizable with the rest of tasks, I see no reason to forcibly block it, or to prevent any newcomer from doing it.

Import Wave feature?

2011-05-18 Thread Ali Lown
On the old waveprotocol site task list, this is still listed as waiting for google to implement export. Export has now been available for a while for waves, has any progress been made on importing them? The HTML option, actually provides the data in a JSON form, is there are parser for this

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-18 Thread Yuri Z
Google Wave Data API was modified to allow to request the whole history of the wave - which in effect allows to import it. But AFAIK no one is working on a tool that would actually import the history into WIAB deltas store. 2011/5/18 Ali Lown a...@lown.me.uk On the old waveprotocol site task

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-18 Thread Ali Lown
Looking at the python interface: I can see the robot.fetch_wavelet method, but that only returns a snapshot at that point in time. How would I request the full history of the wave (wavelet?). Ali On 18 May 2011 20:51, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Google Wave Data API was modified to allow

Re: Import Wave feature?

2011-05-18 Thread Zachary “Gamer_Z . ” Yaro
IMHO better wave persistence and storage are needed before we should consider mass importing from Gwave. --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 17:20, Soren Lassen sorenlas...@gmail.com wrote: There's some documentation about the data export features in the Data API here: