On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 15:07:19 +0200
Auke Booij a...@tulcod.com wrote:
On 30 July 2014 20:27, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually no. Binding writers are expected to write their own code
generator for their language, like wayland-scanner is for C. You
are expected to not use
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:23:23 -0700
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
I think the way it's handled in subsurfaces allows you to create a
subsurface from a surface, delete the surface, and then re-use the surface
as something else. If I recall correctly, weston allows a fair amount of
Hi all,
Previously I posted patches about wayland-tracer, a wire protocol dumper
for wayland. It has turned into a self-contained project and a lot of
development have taken place. Now, I'm happy to announce that XML parser
and protocol analyzer has been added so it can produce a human-readable
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:37 +0200
Manuel Bachmann manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org wrote:
Hi Jasper, Jason,
Agreed. Especially if you start an application, but it's slow to start,
and you have typed into the current window or have navigated away from it
since, you should get a popup
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
Manuel Bachmann manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just updated the repo today (
https://github.com/Tarnyko/weston-xdg_surface_present/commit/0aca29d4b6dbe10d5237aaf5f35f72d25db3ac30).
The xdg_surface_present() request not accepts
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
Manuel Bachmann manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just updated the repo today (
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
Manuel Bachmann manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just updated
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
Manuel Bachmann
On 3 August 2014 09:08, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
It was, hidden in a small paragraph in the documentation...
I have to apologize, you are right.
I guess that this is convention in C?
[...]
Thanks for your perfectly clear explanation, that does clarify it a lot.
Speaking
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 17:07:44 +0200
Auke Booij a...@tulcod.com wrote:
Speaking of which, is there a reason the code samples don't show up
correctly in the online documentation?
Which code samples exactly?
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/docs/html/chap-Library.html
- wl_list
-
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:23:06 -0400
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen
On 30 July 2014 20:27, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually no. Binding writers are expected to write their own code
generator for their language, like wayland-scanner is for C. You
are expected to not use the static inline generated C functions.
All the static inline functions
sorry about the delay, was on holidays.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 04:30:41PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:23:49 +
Bryce W. Harrington b.harring...@samsung.com wrote:
The shell command for dist_man3_MANS gets invoked several times during
the make process but before
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
src/evdev.c | 7 ++-
src/evdev.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c
index f980812..a125510 100644
--- a/src/evdev.c
+++ b/src/evdev.c
@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:25PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
It's up to a evdev device backend to configure seat capabilities it
supports. Even though it may be possible for a touchpad to have extra
keys, there is currently no support for sending keyboard events from the
touchpad driver, and
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:26PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
Some tests in test/path.c and test/udev.c are not dependent on
device behaviour but rather managing of device lifetime etc. Run those
tests only once with only one device, resulting more or less the same
code coverage but shorter run
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:28PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
The kernel may send a 'release' event without ever having sent a key
'pressed' event in case the key was pressed before libinput was
initiated. Ignore these events so that we always guarantee a release
event always comes after a
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:03:25AM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
On 07/27/2014 11:48 PM, Ran Benita wrote:
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:28PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
The kernel may send a 'release' event without ever having sent a key
'pressed' event in case the key was pressed
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
Keep track of the number of times a given button or key is pressed on a
device. For regular mouse devices or keyboard devices, such a count will
never exceed 1, but counting button presses could help when button
presses with the same
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
When removing a device, its not guaranteed that all button or key
presses have been released, resulting in an invalid seat wide button
count.
Note that kernel devices normally will send release events when being
unplugged, but
Hi,
The issue was in my wayland package. It wasn't compiles properly with
scanner enabled. Compiled wayland with the scanner support and hence fixed
my issue.
Thanks for the support.
Regards,
Shrisha
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net
wrote:
On Fri, Jul
21 matches
Mail list logo