On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:06:26 +0800
Xiong Zhang xiong.y.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang xiong.y.zh...@intel.com
---
clients/window.c| 26 --
shared/cairo-util.h | 7 +++
shared/frame.c | 49
Hi,
On 8 September 2014 20:08, Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm probably being stupid, but I still can't figure out how it chooses the
output for a NON-maximized surface. I would think that should use exactly
the same algorithm as maximized does here?
Each surface has assigned
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:00:37 -0700
Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/07/2014 11:28 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
I think it is safe to assume the contents of argv will not get overwritten.
It is common to copy argv itself and modify that, but not to modify the
strings it points
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:14:34 +
Zhang, Xiong Y xiong.y.zh...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:06:26 +0800
Xiong Zhang xiong.y.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang xiong.y.zh...@intel.com
---
clients/window.c| 26 --
man usleep says that bahaviour of using usleep with SIGALRM signal
is unspecified. So use nanosleep instead.
Signed-off-by: Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com
---
tests/display-test.c | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:26:33 +0300
Giulio Camuffo giuliocamu...@gmail.com wrote:
The move_signal in weston_output isn't used, and not even initialized,
so anything trying to listen to it will crash on wl_signal_add().
Instead of it, the 'output_moved_signal' in weston_compositor is
used, so
man usleep says that bahaviour of using usleep with SIGALRM signal
is unspecified. So create our own usleep that calls nanosleep instead.
Signed-off-by: Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com
---
tests/display-test.c | 23 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
Hi,
this should really be two separate patches, each with a specific commit
message. The subject line here does not really tell much.
I rewrote the commit message, and pushed.
Thanks,
pq
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 07:32:05 +0900
Ryo Munakata ryomnk...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ryo Munakata
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang xiong.y.zh...@intel.com
---
clients/window.c| 26 --
shared/cairo-util.h | 7 +++
shared/frame.c | 49 +
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:18:02 +0300
Giulio Camuffo giuliocamu...@gmail.com wrote:
The destructor set on the wl_output resources needs the weston_output
to be allocated, because it removes the resource from its list.
So unset the destructor on all the resources when destroying an
output.
---
On 4 September 2014 15:17, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:21:30 +0200
Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com wrote:
When wl_display_read_events() returns with errno == EAGAIN, we
naturally try to call it again. But this next call results in deadlock.
Hi,
On 9 September 2014 07:49, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:00:37 -0700
Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/07/2014 11:28 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Trying to shut up valgrind on exit is an exercise in futility and adding
a free() to try to shut
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 10:06 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:14:34 +
Zhang, Xiong Y zh...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:06:26 +0800
Xiong Zhang zh...@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang zh...@intel.com
---
clients/window.c| 26
On 9 September 2014 13:10, Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2014 15:17, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:21:30 +0200
Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com wrote:
When wl_display_read_events() returns with errno == EAGAIN, we
naturally
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:10:48 +0200
Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2014 15:17, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:21:30 +0200
Marek Chalupa mchqwe...@gmail.com wrote:
When wl_display_read_events() returns with errno == EAGAIN, we
On 09/08/2014 11:15 PM, Marek Chalupa wrote:
Each surface has assigned output it is currently mapped on (so it can be
NULL). This surface-output is set by weston_surface_assign_output which
is called by weston_view_assign_output (and that by
weston_surface_update_transform) or by surface_unmap.
On 09/08/2014 11:49 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
parse_options() already strdups() all strings it returns, which is one
reason why I would not go removing the strdups.
You are right it already does that. Did not realize it even though I
worked some on that code. I figured it was doing pointer
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:15:42PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:16:07PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:25:25AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
WL_CALIBRATION, introduced in weston-1.1, requires the translation
component
of the calibration
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:42:26PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:15:42PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:16:07PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:25:25AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
WL_CALIBRATION, introduced in
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
src/libinput.h | 32
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/libinput.h b/src/libinput.h
index 7fde65f..a0e5d4c 100644
--- a/src/libinput.h
+++ b/src/libinput.h
@@ -104,6 +104,38 @@ extern C {
Make this part of our API proper and outline the 4 most common examples.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
src/libinput.h | 18 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/libinput.h b/src/libinput.h
index 5af0dde..7fde65f 100644
On 09/09/2014 04:40 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
+ * The udev property is parsed as 6 floating point numbers separated by a
+ * single space each (scanf(3) format %f %f %f %f %f %f).
+ * The 6 values represent the first two rows of the calibration matrix as
+ * described in
22 matches
Mail list logo
