Hello,
Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Remi,
While this would probably be nice, your approach isnt going to work.
Yeah, I figured that much after I submitted the patch. And then I
rediscovered that the client library does not actually know the version
of the project
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:48:27 -0700
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
One of my issues is what happens for objects that have multiple parents,
like wl_buffer or wl_callback. What do we do if another person wants to
introduce another (like the recently proposed pointer lock
Re-adding CCs and some more...
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net wrote:
Hello,
Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Remi,
While this would probably be nice, your approach isnt going to work.
Yeah, I figured that much after I submitted
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:45:14 +0300
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Re-adding CCs and some more...
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net wrote:
Hello,
Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Remi,
While this would probably be
Le 2014-10-06 11:26, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
4 or higher as a wl_surface version 3? If not, I cannot rely on
'wl_proxy_get_version(surface) = 2'...
Changing the semantics[5] of wl_surface.damage is a good example
where
this would fail indeed. If a library only knows up to version 3, but
Le 2014-10-06 12:52, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
Could this be solved (completely?) by saying that libraries that take
existing wl_proxy objects such that they
a) set up listeners, or
b) create new wl_proxies from it and set their listeners;
need to also offer API to tell which versions of the
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:01:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
We use stdbool elsewhere, so use it here too for consistency.
---
src/evdev.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c
index d8e3e5a..1b4ce10 100644
---
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:36:30AM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
On 09/11/2014 07:34 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I don't like the Smart disable as a name because the consumer of the
API might only see one device for both the trackpoint and the touchpad
in which case you want to disable
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:48:27 -0700
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
One of my issues is what happens for objects that have multiple parents,
like wl_buffer or wl_callback. What do we do if another
On Oct 6, 2014 12:45 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Re-adding CCs and some more...
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net wrote:
Hello,
Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Remi,
While this would probably be nice, your
On 10/06/2014 05:59 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
FORCE_ENABLED - Bypass anything that makes the device stop reporting events.
why would you want that setting? if it's disabled when it shouldn't be then
this is a bug we need to fix.
It is what you are calling enabled.
My complaint is that the
11 matches
Mail list logo
