On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:46:15PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:27:29PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > Here's our schedule[1]:
> >
> > - 1.11-alpha around May 3rd. Major features done by this point.
> >
> > - 1.11-beta around May 17th.
> >
> > - 1.11-rc1
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:27:29PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Here's our schedule[1]:
>
> - 1.11-alpha around May 3rd. Major features done by this point.
>
> - 1.11-beta around May 17th.
>
> - 1.11-rc1 around May 24th.
>
> - 1.11.0 release around May 31st.
>
> Any changes to
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:08:49PM -0500, Yong Bakos wrote:
> On May 3, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >
> > Trackballs are effectively stationary devices and can be positioned at any
> > rotation. They are also employed by users with impaired dexterity which
On May 3, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> Trackballs are effectively stationary devices and can be positioned at any
> rotation. They are also employed by users with impaired dexterity which
> sometimes implies that they are positioned at an non-default
Very nice to see that finally landing! :)
Since this patch has been created by Auke Booij back in 2015 (thank
you very much!), there have been some protocol additions in the DnD
area, which also need proper enum attributes. From the wayland.xml of
the C++ Bindings[1]:
wayland.xml:543:
Currently unused, but oh, the possibilities...
The only thing we have to go on for trackballs at the moment is whether they
have "Trackball" in the name string. All others need to be manually tagged.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
src/evdev.c
Trackballs are effectively stationary devices and can be positioned at any
rotation. They are also employed by users with impaired dexterity which
sometimes implies that they are positioned at an non-default angle to make the
buttons easier to reach.
Add a config option for rotation for trackball
Rather than a list where the only difference is the LIBINPUT_MODEL vs
EVDEV_MODEL prefix, use a macro.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
src/evdev.c | 41 ++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:42:52PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 12:49:04 +0200
> Armin Krezović wrote:
> > > So, the backends should indicate to the compositor (and thence to the
> > > enabled shell) that the output change has occurred, and then the
On 3 May 2016 at 13:04, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 12:39:12 +
> Auke Booij wrote:
>
>> The enum attribute, for which scanner support was introduced in
>> 1771299, can be used to link message arguments to s. However,
>> some arguments
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:58 AM, James Jones wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 09:58 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> On 3 May 2016 at 17:29, James Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Given Wayland is designed such that clients drive buffer allocation
>>
>>
>> I'd just
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:29:58AM -0700, James Jones wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 09:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:16:28PM -0700, James Jones wrote:
> >>Streams could provide a way to express that the compositor picked the wrong
> >>plane, but they don't solve the optimal
Hi James,
On 3 May 2016 at 17:29, James Jones wrote:
> Given Wayland is designed such that clients drive buffer allocation
I'd just note that this isn't strictly true. I've personally
implemented Wayland support for platforms (media playback on an
extremely idiosyncratic
Hi James,
On 3 May 2016 at 17:07, James Jones wrote:
> On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> With new Wayland protocol, patches to all Wayland compositors to send
>>> proper
>>> hints to clients using this protocol, improvements to GBM, and updates to
>>> both of
On 05/03/2016 09:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:16:28PM -0700, James Jones wrote:
Streams could provide a way to express that the compositor picked the wrong
plane, but they don't solve the optimal configuration problem. Configuration
is a tricky mix of policy and
On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi James,
On 29 April 2016 at 22:16, James Jones wrote:
I was on leave when this discussion was started. Now that I'm back, I'd
like to respond to a few points raised below:
Welcome back!
Thanks!
On 03/29/2016 09:44 AM,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:16:28PM -0700, James Jones wrote:
> Streams could provide a way to express that the compositor picked the wrong
> plane, but they don't solve the optimal configuration problem. Configuration
> is a tricky mix of policy and capabilities that something like HWComposer or
>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:27:21 +0200
Benoit Gschwind wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Gschwind
> ---
> v1:
> - fix missing file
> - update Makefile.am
>
> Makefile.am | 3 +++
> src/compositor-rpi.c | 42
On 02/05/2016 23:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
When pixman is used and no connector could be found (or any other
error), drm_backend_create() tried to destroy a gbm_device that would
only be created in init_egl(), resulting in a segfault.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
On 02/05/2016 23:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
---
src/compositor-drm.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-drm.c b/src/compositor-drm.c
index ea118fa..c11562f 100644
---
On 02/05/2016 23:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
---
src/compositor-drm.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-drm.c b/src/compositor-drm.c
index a47b453..7c5e1af 100644
--- a/src/compositor-drm.c
On 02/05/2016 23:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
The current behaviour leaves the name empty, making it somewhat harder
to determine the characteristics of this mode from a debugger.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
---
src/compositor-drm.c | 2 ++
1 file
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:35 +0200
Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> Check autoconfs $cross_compiling instead as AC_CANONICAL_HOST call
> will fail if the host cpu is not recognised (which can happen when
> e.g. Yocto builds for "allarch").
>
> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen
Hi comic,
git-am tells me:
Applying: weston-launch: fix incorrect group read in weston_launch_allowed
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
error: patch failed: src/weston-launch.c:113
error: src/weston-launch.c: patch does not apply
error: Did you hand edit your patch?
It does not
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:50:49 +0100
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> From: Quentin Glidic
>
> This will allow plugins to be aware of e.g. panels, to avoid covering
> them with other surfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Glidic
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:09:26 +
Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> This makes LTO builds compile, and also reduces the build time.
> ---
> Makefile.am | 2 ++
> configure.ac | 8
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Benoit Gschwind wrote:
> Hello Bryce,
>
> It's look the you use space within Makefile.am instead of tabulation.
>
> Le 30/04/2016 10:30, Benoit Gschwind a écrit :
> > Hello Bryce,
> >
> > It look good after trivial rebase to master.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2 May 2016 17:33:14 -0700
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:49:04PM +0200, Armin Krezović wrote:
> > On 30.04.2016 22:14, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Armin Krezović wrote:
> > > But virtual outputs is
> simply said, I don't know. It's one of the things where we have to write
> most of the interface, see if it makes sense and then remove the bits that
> we don't actually need. your main target right now is a rotary encoder
> but I do encourage you to think of how to deal with other devices that
[this got stuck in my drafts folder, sorry]
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On 04/10/2016 09:15 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> > ---
> > Adjustments for the new API in 2/5
> > +static void
> >
30 matches
Mail list logo