libinput - Wacom Intuos PT S 2 Finger

2017-03-02 Thread g
Hello, I've just received the tablet mentioned above. I've tried to get it up and running with libinput-gestures. When starting gestures I get the following error: libinput error: libinput bug: Device 'Wacom Intuos PT S 2 Pad' does not meet tablet criteria. Ignoring this device. I guess it's

Re: [PATCH weston v2] compositor-drm: pageflip timeout implementation

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:35:11 + Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote: > Weston will not repaint until previous update has been acked by a > pageflip event coming from the drm driver. However, some buggy drivers > won’t return those events or will stop sending them at some

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Jonas, > > > I would prefer leaning towards just making the compositors more > > > considerate about their Xwayland configuration. I believe the global > > > trend is to move towards the compositor having all the configurability > > > in itself, and all the other components having a single

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:47:10AM -0500, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > > configuration bypass. > > True. > > > I would prefer leaning towards just

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 05:47:10 -0500 (EST) Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > > configuration bypass. > > True. > > > I would prefer

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Pekka, > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > configuration bypass. True. > I would prefer leaning towards just making the compositors more > considerate about their Xwayland configuration. I

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:45:11 +0100 Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi all, > > I am seeing quite a few Xwayland crashes related to glamor. > > Various issues, could be with glamor itself or with the drivers (like the > issues I witness with nv30), whatever. > > To investigate

[PATCH xserver v2] xwayland: add envvar XWAYLAND_NO_GLAMOR

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Not all compositors allow for customizing the Xwayland command line, gnome-shell/mutter for example have the command line and path to Xwayland binary hardcoded, which makes it harder for users to disable glamor acceleration in Xwayland (glamor being used by default). Add an environment variable

Re: [PATCH xserver] xwayland: add envvar XWAYLAND_NO_GLAMOR

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Eric, > > Not all compositors allow for customizing the Xwayland command line, > > gnome-shell/mutter for example have the command line and path to > > Xwayland binary hardcoded, which makes it harder for users to disable > > glamor acceleration in Xwayland (glamor being used by default). > >

Re: [PATCH weston 19/68] compositor-drm: Refcount drm_fb

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:17:14 + Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 1 March 2017 at 10:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:46:21 + Daniel Stone > > wrote: > >> On 28 February 2017 at 10:59, Pekka Paalanen

[PATCH weston v3] ivi-shell: add_screen_remove_layer API

2017-03-02 Thread Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1)
It is analagous to layer_remove_surface API. The API removes a layer from the render order of the screen. v3: add the new vfunc at the end of the ivi_layout_interface struct. Signed-off-by: Emre Ucan --- ivi-shell/ivi-layout-export.h | 10 ++