[RFC v3 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2018-12-10 Thread Scott Anderson
Hi, I thought I would try to push this [1] protocol along, as it's what would be needed for wayland client gamepad input. There is still no client-side "libgamepadinput", so clients are on their own when it comes to handling these devices. Here is a basic proof-of-concept implementation for

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] unstable: add xcursor-configuration

2018-12-10 Thread Drew DeVault
On 2018-12-10 3:24 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > This reason comes up everytime D-Bus is mentioned, and I think it's > somewhat counter productive; I don't think this is a problem clients > should try to avoid so hard. D-Bus is more or less the universal IPC on > Linux, is used quite extensively to

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] unstable: add xcursor-configuration

2018-12-10 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:10:30PM +, Simon Ser wrote: > On Monday, December 10, 2018 2:51 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > There is an alternative more generic solution to this problem, and all > > other related to what XSettings did in the past. If we'd end up > > introducing a protocol like

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] unstable: add xcursor-configuration

2018-12-10 Thread Simon Ser
On Monday, December 10, 2018 2:51 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > There is an alternative more generic solution to this problem, and all > other related to what XSettings did in the past. If we'd end up > introducing a protocol like this, we might end up with many tiny > protocols for things previously

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] unstable: add xcursor-configuration

2018-12-10 Thread Jonas Ådahl
There is an alternative more generic solution to this problem, and all other related to what XSettings did in the past. If we'd end up introducing a protocol like this, we might end up with many tiny protocols for things previously covered by XSettings. Cursor things, font things, and what not.

Re: Weston: output scaling does not seem to have any effect

2018-12-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:07:22 +0100 Peter Bašista wrote: > Hi, > > Weston does not seem to perform any output scaling unless an explicit and > correct output name is given. Hi, yes, that is correct. A correct output name must be given. > At least in my case, it was *not* sufficient > to add