On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:27 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> there is a single, unambiguous answer on Wayland: the compositor owns
> the pipeline. Therefore we won't have the kind of problems you describe
> above.
>
> These are the very reasons I am against adding any kind of protocol
> extension
From: Vadim Zhukov
Co-authored-by: Koop Mast
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
configure.ac| 3 +++
tests/test-runner.c | 22 +-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index c5ead62..a60a927 100644
---
*BSD don't have /proc/self/fd, they use /dev/fd instead.
At Linux /dev/fd is a symlink to /proc/self/fd
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
tests/test-helpers.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-helpers.c b/tests/test-helpers.c
index
From: Imre Vadász
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
configure.ac | 4
src/wayland-shm.c | 30 ++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index c0f1c37..dcefc78 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -65,6 +65,10
From: Vadim Zhukov
Co-authored-by: Koop Mast
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
configure.ac | 3 +++
src/wayland-server.c | 35 +++
src/wayland-shm.c| 10 ++
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
Makefile.am | 6 +++---
configure.ac | 6 ++
m4/weston.m4 | 37 +
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 m4/weston.m4
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index f47d055..489f581 100644
From: Vadim Zhukov
*BSD don't have waitid()
Co-authored-by: Koop Mast
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bobrov
---
configure.ac| 4
tests/test-compositor.c | 25 +++--
tests/test-runner.c | 29 -
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:56:06 +0100
Kai-Uwe wrote:
> Am 26.02.19 um 16:48 schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:31:35 +0100
> > Niels Ole Salscheider wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Niels Ole Salscheider
>
> > My failing is that I haven't read about what ICC v4 definition
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:18:44 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:00 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > that is some interesting background, but I feel like I didn't quite
> > catch the point.
> >
> > If the CRTC color management pipeline (LUT-CTM-LUT + maybe
From: Pekka Paalanen
The experience from Weston shows that the Gitlab merge request based workflow
works really well. Recently there have also been issues with the mailing list
that have made the email based workflow more painful than it used to be. Those
issues might have been temporary or
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:13:03 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 13:42, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > The experience from Weston shows that the Gitlab merge request based
> > workflow
> > works really well. Recently there have also been issues with the mailing
> >
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:11:45 +1300
Scott Anderson wrote:
> On 25/02/19 8:21 pm, AMAR SEN wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Is there any client side functionality to handle multiple displays?
> > It can be seen as like a particular client has some options that can
> > direct the server to show frames
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 05:47, Nautiyal, Ankit K
wrote:
>
> From: Ankit Nautiyal
>
> This protcol enables a client to send the hdr meta-data:
> MAX-CLL, MAX-FALL, Max Luminance and Min Luminance as defined by
> SMPTE ST.2086.
> The clients get these values for an HDR video, encoded for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
