Re: Xwayland component in bugzilla

2019-05-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 11:09 +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:29:50AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Thu, 09 May 2019 14:03:52 -0400 > > > Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > > > The Xwayland component of

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] xdg-output: Clarify that output positions refer to the top-left corner

2019-05-10 Thread Simon Ser
Looks good. Could you write a similar patch for wayland core? However it's missing a S-o-b line. Also please put the timely commentary after the "---" separator so that it doesn't appear in the commit message. ___ wayland-devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] xdg-output: Clarify that output positions refer to the top-left corner

2019-05-10 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:53 PM William Wold wrote: > > I already sent this two weeks ago, but I didn't get the subject right > and I didn't get any response. Hopefully this will work better. I Yeap, sorry I missed it :/ > believe this is just clarifying what the protocol already meant

[PATCH wayland-protocols] xdg-output: Clarify that output positions refer to the top-left corner

2019-05-10 Thread William Wold
I already sent this two weeks ago, but I didn't get the subject right and I didn't get any response. Hopefully this will work better. I believe this is just clarifying what the protocol already meant (but I can't be sure, on account of it not currently being clear). ---

Re: [PATCH wayland-protocols] xdg-output: deprecate the xdg_output.done event

2019-05-10 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Simon, On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:22 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Simon Ser wrote: >> >> On Monday, April 29, 2019 9:51 AM, Olivier Fourdan >> wrote: >> > > On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan >> > > wrote: >> > IMHO, it would better,

Re: Xwayland component in bugzilla

2019-05-10 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:29:50AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 09 May 2019 14:03:52 -0400 > > Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > The Xwayland component of the Wayland product in bugzilla is still open > > > for bug entry. Does

Re: Xwayland component in bugzilla

2019-05-10 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:29:50AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 09 May 2019 14:03:52 -0400 > Adam Jackson wrote: > > > The Xwayland component of the Wayland product in bugzilla is still open > > for bug entry. Does anyone actually want this? I'm happy to migrate the > > remaining open

Re: Xwayland component in bugzilla

2019-05-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 09 May 2019 14:03:52 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote: > The Xwayland component of the Wayland product in bugzilla is still open > for bug entry. Does anyone actually want this? I'm happy to migrate the > remaining open bugs into xserver's gitlab issues where they belong, but > I wanted to make

Re: Using libweston with GTK/GDK

2019-05-10 Thread adlo
> On 10 May 2019, at 08:48, adlo wrote: > > I put a call to weston_log() in my server-side bind function and then called > wl_global_create() in my client. I was expecting to see my log entry printed > to the screen but I got nothing. > > What could be going on? I meant wl_registry_bind(),

Re: Using libweston with GTK/GDK

2019-05-10 Thread adlo
On 9 May 2019, at 10:43, adlo wrote: >> On 1 May 2019, at 10:34, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> >> it is all just the normal Wayland protocol exchange but with a new >> interface of your own design. I'm not sure if there is a really >> minimal example, but I'll list at least some. >> >> One example