Re: [Intel-gfx] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:38 AM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 07:27, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes > > already, here's the long version. > > > > The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular

Re: gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Drew, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 22:43, Drew DeVault wrote: > I rigged up SourceHut CI for use with gitlab.fd.o several months ago, as > part of investigation to see if wlroots and sway could be moved there. > It's still set up - anyone with a sr.ht account can go to dispatch.sr.ht > and create a

Re: [Mesa-dev] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Tom Stellard
On 02/27/2020 01:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes > already, here's the long version. > > The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our > communities, and is used extensively. This especially includes all

Re: [Mesa-dev] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Tom Stellard
On 02/27/2020 05:00 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/27/2020 01:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes >> already, here's the long version. >> >> The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our >> communities, an

Re: [Intel-gfx] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 07:27, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes > already, here's the long version. > > The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our > communities, and is used extensively. This especially inclu

Re: gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:27:04 +0100 Daniel Vetter said: Might I suggest that given the kind of expenses detailed here, literally buying 1 - 4 reasonably specced boxes and hosting them at OSUOSL would be incredibly cheaper? (we (enlightenment.org) have been doing so for years on a single box). We f

Re: gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:27:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes > already, here's the long version. > > The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our > communities, and is used extensively. This espec

Re: gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:27 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes > already, here's the long version. > > The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our > communities, and is used extensively. This especially inc

Re: gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Drew DeVault
I rigged up SourceHut CI for use with gitlab.fd.o several months ago, as part of investigation to see if wlroots and sway could be moved there. It's still set up - anyone with a sr.ht account can go to dispatch.sr.ht and create a task which rigs up GitLab commits to builds.sr.ht jobs. I filed a bug

gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services

2020-02-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, You might have read the short take in the X.org board meeting minutes already, here's the long version. The good news: gitlab.fd.o has become very popular with our communities, and is used extensively. This especially includes all the CI integration. Modern development process and tooling