On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 01:33, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>
> Loosen the requirements for atomic and legacy commit so that, in cases
> where pixel_source != FB, the commit can still go through.
>
> This includes adding framebuffer NULL checks in other areas to account for
> FB being NULL when non-FB
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 01:33, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>
> Document and add support for solid_fill property to drm_plane. In
> addition, add support for setting and getting the values for solid_fill.
>
> To enable solid fill planes, userspace must assign a property blob to
> the "solid_fill" plane
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 15:02, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:10:05 +0100
> Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > * xwayland-run, to spawn an X11 client within its own dedicated Xwayland
> > rootful instance,
>
> wouldn't this one be at home in the xserver repository?
>
Yes,
On Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 at 10:35, Olivier Fourdan
wrote:
> > I'd prefer this to be kept in your personal namespace: I'd prefer not to
> > make
> > this an official Wayland project.
>
> Well, that was quick! :)
>
> If I may, would it be possible to elaborate on the rationale behind
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:10:05 +0100
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we ship a small shell script called
> "xvfb-run" originating from Debian to launch an X11 client within Xvfb.
>
> With the future removal of Xorg and all related Xservers in RHEL
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:27 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we ship a small shell script called
> "xvfb-run" originating from Debian to launch an X11 client within Xvfb.
>
> With the future removal of Xorg and all related Xservers in RHEL [1],
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:05:38 -0800
Robert Ayrapetyan wrote:
> Hi there, I'm having difficulty locating the specific location in the
> Wayland codebase where registry_bind function is called. I'm trying to
> comprehend why, for particular globals, there is no occurrence of a
> global->bind call.
On 11/29/23 10:35, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 10:16, Simon Ser wrote:
I'd prefer this to be kept in your personal namespace: I'd prefer not to
make
this an official Wayland project.
Well, that was quick! :)
If I may, would it be possible to elaborate on the
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 10:16, Simon Ser wrote:
>
> I'd prefer this to be kept in your personal namespace: I'd prefer not to
> make
> this an official Wayland project.
>
>
Well, that was quick! :)
If I may, would it be possible to elaborate on the rationale behind your
opinion, is
On 11/29/23 10:10, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
[...]
So my question is, if there is any interest for such a project [4], should
this be moved to the wayland namespace in gitlab (we could even change the
name of the project), should that be added to the existing
"wayland-utility" project that we have
On Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 at 10:10, Olivier Fourdan
wrote:
> So my question is, if there is any interest for such a project [4], should
> this be moved to the wayland namespace in gitlab (we could even change the
> name of the project), should that be added to the existing
Hi all,
In Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we ship a small shell script called
"xvfb-run" originating from Debian to launch an X11 client within Xvfb.
With the future removal of Xorg and all related Xservers in RHEL [1],
except Xwayland, there was a need for a replacement utility that would
12 matches
Mail list logo
