Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-30 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:34:53 + Emil Velikov wrote: > On 26 January 2018 at 02:44, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:56:45PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 25 January 2018 at 02:01, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-26 Thread Emil Velikov
On 26 January 2018 at 02:44, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:56:45PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 25 January 2018 at 02:01, Jonas Ådahl wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:15:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> On 24 January 2018 at

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-25 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:56:45PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 25 January 2018 at 02:01, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:15:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 24 January 2018 at 18:20, Derek Foreman wrote: > >> > On 2018-01-22

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-25 Thread Emil Velikov
On 25 January 2018 at 02:01, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:15:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 24 January 2018 at 18:20, Derek Foreman wrote: >> > On 2018-01-22 09:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> >> >> On 22 August 2017 at 14:02,

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-24 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:15:09PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 24 January 2018 at 18:20, Derek Foreman wrote: > > On 2018-01-22 09:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> > >> On 22 August 2017 at 14:02, Emil Velikov wrote: > >>> > >>> On 18 August

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-24 Thread Emil Velikov
On 24 January 2018 at 18:20, Derek Foreman wrote: > On 2018-01-22 09:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> On 22 August 2017 at 14:02, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> >>> On 18 August 2017 at 13:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >>> >>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-24 Thread Derek Foreman
On 2018-01-22 09:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: On 22 August 2017 at 14:02, Emil Velikov wrote: On 18 August 2017 at 13:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: The exported configuration would then be: LOCAL_INTERFACE_DECL=extern EXTERN_INTERFACE_DECL=extern

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2018-01-22 Thread Emil Velikov
On 22 August 2017 at 14:02, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 18 August 2017 at 13:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > >>> > >>> > The exported configuration would then be: >>> > LOCAL_INTERFACE_DECL=extern >>> > EXTERN_INTERFACE_DECL=extern >>> >

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2017-08-22 Thread Emil Velikov
On 18 August 2017 at 13:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> > >> > The exported configuration would then be: >> > LOCAL_INTERFACE_DECL=extern >> > EXTERN_INTERFACE_DECL=extern >> > LOCAL_INTERFACE_DEF=WL_EXPORT >> > >> > That would be far too flexible and no-one would use it right,

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2017-08-18 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:13:48 +0100 Emil Velikov wrote: > On 27 July 2017 at 14:25, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:56:19 +0100 > > Emil Velikov wrote: > > > >> From: Emil Velikov

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2017-07-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 27 July 2017 at 14:25, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:56:19 +0100 > Emil Velikov wrote: > >> From: Emil Velikov >> >> The option is used to indicate how the code will be used - would it be a >> part of

Re: [PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2017-07-27 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:56:19 +0100 Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > The option is used to indicate how the code will be used - would it be a > part of shared or static one. > > In the former case one needs to export the

[PATCH 3/5] scanner: introduce --object-type option

2017-07-26 Thread Emil Velikov
From: Emil Velikov The option is used to indicate how the code will be used - would it be a part of shared or static one. In the former case one needs to export the specific symbols, although normally people want to statically build the protocol code into their