Re: [PATCH 4/6] clients: rename simple-dmabuf into simple-dmabuf-intel

On 24/11/15 01:28 PM, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote: > This client was using an Intel-specific way to allocate a dmabuf, so it > makes sense to have that in its name. > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot > Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen

[PATCH 4/6] clients: rename simple-dmabuf into simple-dmabuf-intel

This client was using an Intel-specific way to allocate a dmabuf, so it makes sense to have that in its name. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot Reviewed-by: Pekka Paalanen Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone