I've pushed this series now.
Thanks,
Derek
On 2018-04-16 03:00 PM, Derek Foreman wrote:
> Now that the release is out, I'd like to dig back into this mess.
> This is a round up of some patches that were on list shortly before
> the release to deal with a problem where many existing libwayland
>
On 2018-04-16 04:29 PM, Markus Ongyerth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for getting to this. I was waiting for the release, but I'm currently
> not at full capacity, so you got it before me.
>
> The commit message of patch 1 contains a lie. The second paragraph should
> contain "IF there was only one
Hi,
Thanks for getting to this. I was waiting for the release, but I'm currently
not at full capacity, so you got it before me.
The commit message of patch 1 contains a lie. The second paragraph should
contain "IF there was only one listener object", which the testcase in Patch 3
shows. But I
Now that the release is out, I'd like to dig back into this mess.
This is a round up of some patches that were on list shortly before
the release to deal with a problem where many existing libwayland
users don't delete their destroy signal listeners before freeing
them.
These leads to a bit of a
