Hi Peter,
On 18 November 2016 at 02:35, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Because we already rely on it in the callers anyway. This is a retrofit, which
> is not ideal but I'm not sure any compositor out there uses anything else.
> Might as well define it.
Thanks for this.
To
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:35:27PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Because we already rely on it in the callers anyway. This is a retrofit, which
> is not ideal but I'm not sure any compositor out there uses anything else.
> Might as well define it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Because we already rely on it in the callers anyway. This is a retrofit, which
is not ideal but I'm not sure any compositor out there uses anything else.
Might as well define it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
This is the button bit only which I think we agreed on so