On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 07:44:39AM +, Simon Ser wrote:
> This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent with a
> xdg_output.done event.
>
> This protocol change has been discussed in a recent xorg-devel discussions
> [1].
>
> First let's recap why a change is
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:52:34 +1200
Scott Anderson wrote:
> >>> This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent
> >>> with a
> >>> xdg_output.done event.
> >>
> >> Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on another protocol
> >> event, it's looks like a
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:22 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Simon Ser wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, April 29, 2019 9:51 AM, Olivier Fourdan
>> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan
>> > > wrote:
>> > IMHO, it would better,
Hi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Simon Ser wrote:
> On Monday, April 29, 2019 9:51 AM, Olivier Fourdan
> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan <
> ofour...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > IMHO, it would better, semantically, to keep `xdg-output.done` and
> > clarify (in
On Monday, April 29, 2019 9:51 AM, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 11:19, Simon Ser wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan
> > wrote:
> > > Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on another protocol
> > > event, it's looks like a
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 11:19, Simon Ser wrote:
> On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan
wrote:
> > Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on another
protocol
> > event, it's looks like a weird mixup to me...
>
> As noted below, this is idiomatic in the Wayland
This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent with a
xdg_output.done event.
Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on another protocol
event, it's looks like a weird mixup to me...
As noted below, this is idiomatic in the Wayland protocol. The
On Sunday, April 28, 2019 12:04 PM, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 9:44 AM Simon Ser wrote:
>
> > This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent
> > with a
> > xdg_output.done event.
>
> Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 9:44 AM Simon Ser wrote:
> This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent
> with a
> xdg_output.done event.
>
Humm, I am not sure I like changing xdg-output to rely on another protocol
event, it's looks like a weird mixup to me...
> This
This commit makes it so a wl_output.done event is guaranteed to be sent with a
xdg_output.done event.
This protocol change has been discussed in a recent xorg-devel discussions [1].
First let's recap why a change is needed: Xwayland listens to both wl_output and
xdg_output changes. When an
10 matches
Mail list logo
