Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:46:17AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:13:42 -0500 > Matt Hoosier wrote: > > > What sort of testing on this series would be most helpful? I figure that > > you and pq have most of the code review covered, so the main

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-03 Thread Matt Hoosier
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:13:42 -0500 > Matt Hoosier wrote: > > > What sort of testing on this series would be most helpful? I figure that > > you and pq have most of the code review covered, so

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:13:42 -0500 Matt Hoosier wrote: > What sort of testing on this series would be most helpful? I figure that > you and pq have most of the code review covered, so the main contribution I > can make with the hardware available to me is to exercise this

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-02 Thread Matt Hoosier
ne [mailto:dan...@fooishbar.org] > > Sent: Mittwoch, 1. November 2017 15:14 > > To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > > Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting > > > > Hi Emre. > > > > On 1 Novembe

RE: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-02 Thread Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
> Sent: Mittwoch, 1. November 2017 15:14 > To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting > > Hi Emre. > > On 1 November 2017 at 11:56, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > <eu...@de.adit-jv.com> w

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-01 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Emre. On 1 November 2017 at 11:56, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) wrote: > Is this the latest WIP branch to test " > https://gitlab.collabora.com/daniels/weston/commits/wip/2017-10/atomic-v13; ? Right you are. > In my opinion, it would easier to review/test your patches if

RE: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-11-01 Thread Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
eering Software Base (ADITG/ESB) Tel. +49 5121 49 6937 > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Stone [mailto:dan...@fooishbar.org] > Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:57 > To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH wes

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-10-12 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Emre, On 12 October 2017 at 10:20, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) wrote: > I tested your branch " wip/2017-09/atomic-v12" on Intel Apollo Lake with: > - Linux Kernel v4.9 > - Libdrm 2.4.83 > - Mesa 13.0.6 Thanks for testing! > In the end, I could not test the atomic

RE: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-10-12 Thread Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
; boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Stone > Sent: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 19:20 > To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting > > Hi, > Here's a cleaned-up and fully-tested version of the atomic series. I'm

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-09-27 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Matt, On 27 September 2017 at 14:46, Matt Hoosier wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Here's a cleaned-up and fully-tested version of the atomic series. > > Just wondering: do you maintain these in a publicly

Re: [PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-09-27 Thread Matt Hoosier
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > Here's a cleaned-up and fully-tested version of the atomic series. Hi; Just wondering: do you maintain these in a publicly fetchable repo somewhere? I didn't turn up anything after some light searching --

[PATCH weston v12 00/40] Atomic modesetting

2017-09-26 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, Here's a cleaned-up and fully-tested version of the atomic series. I'm fairly happy with it now. There are a few things I'd want to change, but figured I'd send it all out now rather than waiting another however long: * I'd rather track unused_{crtcs,connectors} by putting them all in