Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-20 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 15:05 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 > Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Monday, April 13, 2020 1:59 AM, Peter Hutterer > > > wrote: > > > > Hi all,

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-20 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 15:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday, April 13, 2020 1:59 AM, Peter Hutterer > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is request

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-20 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:05:32PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 > Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Monday, April 13, 2020 1:59 AM, Peter Hutterer > > > wrote: > > >> Hi

Re: can subsurface and shell surface be used together to manage surfaces

2020-04-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:13:04 +0800 zou lan wrote: > Hi Matt > > yes, I want to bind a wl_surface to a subsurface first, then create a shell > surface for it. No, you can't do that. > I want to do that is because if the wl surface is created by another > compositor, it had been declared as a

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-20 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday, April 13, 2020 1:59 AM, Peter Hutterer > > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This is request for comments on the exact requirements for