Re: Need support to display application at (0, 0) position on Weston desktop

2023-07-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:29:28 -0500 Igor Korot wrote: > Hi, > I believe with any Wayland stuff you will fail to use absolute positioning. > > you absolutely have to use X11 and forget about Wayland.. > > The Wayland devs are NOT CONVINCED enough to support absolute > positioning and will just

Re: [PATCH] drm: support up to 128 drm devices

2023-07-14 Thread Simon Ser
On Friday, July 14th, 2023 at 12:31, Simon Ser wrote: > Before this patch, 0..63 are for primary, 64..127 are for control (never > exposed by the kernel), 128..191 are for render, 2048..2112 are for accel. > After this patch, 0..127 are for primary, 64..191 are for control (never > exposed by

Re: [PATCH] drm: support up to 128 drm devices

2023-07-14 Thread Simon Ser
(cc Daniel Vetter and Pekka because this change has uAPI repercussions) On Friday, June 30th, 2023 at 13:56, James Zhu wrote: > From: Christian König > > This makes room for up to 128 DRM devices. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > Signed-off-by: James Zhu > --- >

Re: Need support to display application at (0, 0) position on Weston desktop

2023-07-14 Thread Igor Korot
Hi, I believe with any Wayland stuff you will fail to use absolute positioning. you absolutely have to use X11 and forget about Wayland.. The Wayland devs are NOT CONVINCED enough to support absolute positioning and will just tell you to use X11. THank you. On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:55 AM huy