Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-09-19 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote: > On Tue Sep 17, 2019 at 7:53 PM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > I think both for stable and unstable the same limitation can be > > as problematic. A protocol that fits in xdg/wp may still only be > > relevant for a single compositor and

Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-09-19 Thread Drew DeVault
On Tue Sep 17, 2019 at 7:53 PM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > I think both for stable and unstable the same limitation can be > as problematic. A protocol that fits in xdg/wp may still only be > relevant for a single compositor and multiple toolkits, or vice versa, > even when declared stable. Seems to me

Re: universal planes in drm backend

2019-09-19 Thread zou lan
Hi all Thank you for your feedback. >From your opinions, the drm backend reserve primary plane for each CRTC to avoid the failure in hotplug cases. However, as weston already enabled DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ATOMIC and DRM_CLIENT_CAP_UNIVERSAL_PLANES, the concept of primary/overlay is no necessary