Re: surface-suspension wayland protcool development status?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:00:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: […] > >From a purely downstream perspective, I'd like to have Fedora Linux > switch to Wayland by default for SDL-based applications (which we are > able to do relatively quickly and easily since all SDL applications > now use SDL2 since Fedora Linux 35[3]). Hi, that’s very nice! I wrote a similar library[1] for running applications using the GLFW 2 API on top of GLFW 3, and thus natively on Wayland, it’s been tested with Crypt of the Necrodancer so far but should apply to all other GLFW 2 applications, if you have any in Fedora. [1] https://linkmauve.fr/dev/glfw2to3/ -- Emmanuel Gil Peyrot signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: xdg-shell-client-protocol.h
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:15:16PM +, Edgar Mobile wrote: > Greetings, > > I work my way through this Wayland tutorial: > > https://wiki.tizen.org/Wayland_xdg-shell_protocol > > To compile the example, I need a certain header allegedly in the Weston > source tree: > > xdg-shell-client-protocol.h > > But I can't find it. What should I do to make it appear? It's generated from 'xdg-shell.xml'[0] using 'wayland-scanner'. wayland-scanner is part of the wayland repository, and can be found via your distribution, e.g. the 'wayland-devel' package on Fedora. Jonas [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/blob/main/stable/xdg-shell/xdg-shell.xml > > Regards
xdg-shell-client-protocol.h
Greetings, I work my way through this Wayland tutorial: https://wiki.tizen.org/Wayland_xdg-shell_protocol To compile the example, I need a certain header allegedly in the Weston source tree: xdg-shell-client-protocol.h But I can't find it. What should I do to make it appear? Regards
surface-suspension wayland protcool development status?
Hey all, Is there a reason why the development of the surface-suspension protocol[1] has completely stalled out? It's been in the 30 day discussion period for a few months now and it's a pretty critical protocol for games (it's the main blocker for SDL to switch to Wayland by default[2]). >From a purely downstream perspective, I'd like to have Fedora Linux switch to Wayland by default for SDL-based applications (which we are able to do relatively quickly and easily since all SDL applications now use SDL2 since Fedora Linux 35[3]). Thanks in advance and best regards, Neal [1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/99 [2]: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/pull/4306#issuecomment-963513540 [3]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDL12onSDL2 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
