On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:25:18 +0100
Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/02/14 09:36, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
...
Atm. i have to verify on specific X-Server / ddx / Linux kernel
versions, at least for the most common setups i care about, because
there's always potential for
On 21/02/14 09:36, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:40:02 +0100
Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/02/14 12:07, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi Mario,
Ok, now i am magically subscribed. Thanks to the moderator!
Cool, I can start trimming out parts of the email.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:40:02 +0100
Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/02/14 12:07, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi Mario,
Ok, now i am magically subscribed. Thanks to the moderator!
Cool, I can start trimming out parts of the email. :-)
I have replies to your comments
Hi Mario,
I have replies to your comments below, but while reading what you said,
I started wondering whether Wayland would be good for you after all.
It seems that your timing sensitive experiment programs and you and
your developers use a great deal of effort into
- detecting the hardware and
On 20/02/14 12:07, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi Mario,
Ok, now i am magically subscribed. Thanks to the moderator!
I have replies to your comments below, but while reading what you said,
I started wondering whether Wayland would be good for you after all.
It seems that your timing sensitive
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 03:23:40 +
Zhang, Xiong Y xiong.y.zh...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 17:35 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a take two on the Wayland presentation extension.
1. Introduction
The v1 proposal is here:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:25:07 +0100
Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Pekka,
i'm not yet subscribed to wayland-devel, and a bit short on time atm.,
so i'll take a shortcut via direct e-mail for some quick feedback for
your Wayland presentation extension v2.
Hi Mario,
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 17:35 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a take two on the Wayland presentation extension.
1. Introduction
The v1 proposal is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-October/011496.html
In v2 the basic idea is
I think I was wrong to say the display time would always be = to the
time the client specifies. It would be rounded just like you are saying,
the nearest start time would be rounded to the nearest output frame
start time and thus could be earlier.
I tend to think of a frame as covering a
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:27:12 -0800
Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I was wrong to say the display time would always be = to the
time the client specifies. It would be rounded just like you are
saying, the nearest start time would be rounded to the nearest output
frame start
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:23:12 -0600
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:23:29 -0600
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
Pekka,
First off, I think you've done a great job
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:20:00 -0800
Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
This algorithm aims to start showing an update between t-T/2 and t+T/2,
which means that presentation may occur a little early or late, with
an average of zero. Another option would be to show
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:03:41 -0800
Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
I think in absolute time you are right, the P points do not move.
Instead everything else would move left by .5, resulting in the same
image I described with the vertical arrows always tilting to the right.
The green
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:23:29 -0600
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
Pekka,
First off, I think you've done a great job over-all. I think it will both
cover most cases and work well I've got a few comments below.
Thank you for the review. :-)
Replies below.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:39:57 -0600
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a take two on the Wayland
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:23:29 -0600
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
Pekka,
First off, I think you've done a great job over-all. I think it will
both
cover most cases and work well I've got a few
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
This algorithm aims to start showing an update between t-T/2 and t+T/2,
which means that presentation may occur a little early or late, with
an average of zero. Another option would be to show the update between
t and t+T, which would mean that presentation would be always
More comments!
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
The v1 proposal is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-October/011496.html
In v2 the
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a take two on the Wayland presentation extension.
1. Introduction
The v1 proposal is here:
Hi,
On 08/02/2014, Jason Ekstrand wrote :
For each surface with queued content updates and matching main
output, the compositor picks the update with the highest
timestamp no later than a half frame period after the predicted
presentation time. The
OK, that makes more sense. Thank you for stating it in terms of intervals.
I still need to think about it a bit more.
On Feb 8, 2014 4:14 PM, Axel Davy axel.d...@ens.fr wrote:
On 08/02/2014, Axel Davy wrote :
Hi,
On 08/02/2014, Jason Ekstrand wrote :
For each surface with queued
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it's time for a take two on the Wayland presentation extension.
1. Introduction
The v1 proposal is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-October/011496.html
In
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
The v1 proposal is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-October/011496.html
In v2 the basic idea is the same: you can queue frames with a
target presentation time, and you can get accurate
23 matches
Mail list logo
