Hi,
On 18 February 2014 22:47, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
Avoids erroneous timestamps when the system time is reset. This used to a be a
problem with the X.Org synaptics driver where taps, scrolling and a couple of
other things would potentially lock up.
Can this be
On 19 February 2014 13:35, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Can this be CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE instead, to avoid griefing HPET and
thus causing much higher power usage?
Makes sense and indeed the X server seems to use _COARSE if it's
available and has good enough resolution:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:19:15PM +0100, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
On 19 February 2014 13:35, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Can this be CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE instead, to avoid griefing HPET and
thus causing much higher power usage?
Makes sense and indeed the X server seems
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:44:54PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 22:33:26, Jasper St. Pierre escreveu:
... and what if it fails? I'd say that requiring CLOCK_MONOTONIC is fine.
Are there any popular Linux setups that don't have CLOCK_MONOTONIC?
I'm guessing that
Avoids erroneous timestamps when the system time is reset. This used to a be a
problem with the X.Org synaptics driver where taps, scrolling and a couple of
other things would potentially lock up.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
src/evdev.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3
Em qua 19 fev 2014, às 08:47:32, Peter Hutterer escreveu:
+ libevdev_set_clock_id(device-evdev, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
What happens if the monotonic clock isn't supported? Shouldn't you check that
sysconf(_SC_MONOTONIC_CLOCK) 0 ?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT)
... and what if it fails? I'd say that requiring CLOCK_MONOTONIC is fine.
Are there any popular Linux setups that don't have CLOCK_MONOTONIC?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
Em qua 19 fev 2014, às 08:47:32, Peter Hutterer escreveu:
+
Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 22:33:26, Jasper St. Pierre escreveu:
... and what if it fails? I'd say that requiring CLOCK_MONOTONIC is fine.
Are there any popular Linux setups that don't have CLOCK_MONOTONIC?
I'm guessing that some weird and niche embedded boards might not support it.
Which is a
