On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:43:01PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:06:50PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On 26/05/2014 16:32 , Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05/25/2014 10:34 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
We
Hi,
On 05/25/2014 10:34 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
We pin scrolling to the initial direction, so a 2 finger scroll starting
in the vertical direction, will from then on only generate vertical scroll
events, and the same for
On 26/05/2014 16:32 , Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05/25/2014 10:34 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
We pin scrolling to the initial direction, so a 2 finger scroll starting
in the vertical direction, will from then on only generate vertical
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
We pin scrolling to the initial direction, so a 2 finger scroll starting
in the vertical direction, will from then on only generate vertical scroll
events, and the same for horizontal.
But if the first 2 finger motion is
Hi,
On 05/23/2014 05:00 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
Any reason you switched the order of these two if statements around?
Yes to prefer vertical scrolling when both dx and dy meet the threshold
on the initial 2 finger motion, as is stated in the commit message.
Regards,
Hans
On Fri,
We pin scrolling to the initial direction, so a 2 finger scroll starting
in the vertical direction, will from then on only generate vertical scroll
events, and the same for horizontal.
But if the first 2 finger motion is diagonal, then we go into a diagonal
scrolling mode where we post both
Any reason you switched the order of these two if statements around?
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
We pin scrolling to the initial direction, so a 2 finger scroll starting
in the vertical direction, will from then on only generate vertical scroll
