Hi,
I ran into a link error when trying to compile the demos repository
according to the instructions on the Building page:
CCLD compositor
libwayland-egl.so: undefined reference to `wl_drm_interface'
make[3]: *** [compositor] Error 1
All of the packages are freshly compiled from Git
Hi;
I think that you might rather have more success if you just instruct your
weston.service unit file that Weston isn't allowed to start until the DRI
device appears. E.g.,
[Unit]
...
Requires=dev-dri-card0.device # or dev-drm-card0.device as appropriate
for your board
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I'd be 100% in favour of this approach: delaying the original modesets
> until the shell indicates that the scene graph as it stands is totally
> quiescent. I'm working along those lines as we speak for atomic
> anyway:
Hi,
I maintain a small Weston shell plugin for an an embedded use-case. On the
embedded device, the bootloader first paints a buffer and installs it as
the scanout buffer to the graphics hardware. At some point, userspace has
to take over responsibility for painting that background image. It
Hi,
Any further consensus on this?
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:42:34AM -0600, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>> > I'd
Currently the DRM backend ends up picking the bottom-most view which meets
all the checks for eligibility, for direct scanout usage. If more than one
such view exists, we get a visual result counter to expectations -- it
should be the highest-sorted such view that the user sees.
The big loop in
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:07:11PM +0530, Vikas Patil wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Vikas Patil
>
I'm finding that it would be useful for shells implemented against
libweston-desktop to be able to know when the application's title or app-id
changes. Right now, that information is swallowed up inside the internal
logic.
Would a patch exporting changes to title or app_id be welcome? If so, do
-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h | 6 ++
libweston-desktop/surface.c | 21 +
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h
b/libweston-desktop/libweston-des
the app happens to post a buffer next.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> > On 7/20/17 4:33 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> > > It's useful for the shell implementation t
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:42:34AM -0600, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> > I'd find it a little bit inconvenient for the title, class, and app-id to
> > be treated as buffered state. They make a
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Quentin Glidic <
sardemff7+wayl...@sardemff7.net> wrote:
> On 7/20/17 4:33 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
>> It's useful for the shell implementation to know when these change,
>> for example to relay the information on to taskbars or similar.
Okay, this one should be ready to review. Sorry for the noise on the first
attempt.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It's useful for the shell implementation to know when these change,
> for example to relay the information on to taskbar
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:07:01AM -0600, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:42:34AM -0
-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h | 6 ++
libweston-desktop/surface.c | 21 +
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h
b/libweston-desktop/libweston-des
Okay. I'll revise to make the changes Quentin asked for and resubmit.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:13:42AM -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com>
-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h | 3 +++
libweston-desktop/surface.c | 12
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h
b/libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h
index 03
This revision was broken. Disregard, I'm re-sending.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It's useful for the shell implementation to know when these change,
> for example to relay the information on to taskbars or similar.
>
> To
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:11:57 -0700
> Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> On 20 September 2017 at 05:48, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@g
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
> ---
> Makefile.am| 1 +
> unstable/linux-explicit-synchronization/README | 5 +
>
Hi all,
My organization maintains a small patch against the DRM compositor
that causes it to register another output. This output accepts the
usual compositor scenegraph, does the rendering down to a primary
plane, and then funnels the resulting GBM buffer through a codepath
that does video
.
Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
clients/nested.c | 3 +--
libweston/compositor.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clients/nested.c b/clients/nested.c
index e9070e9b..e2bdf684 100644
--- a/clients/nested.c
+++ b/clients/ne
Done:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-September/035191.html
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:31:35 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This change
.
v2:
More information about the historical reasons why this change hadn't
happened yet, and the consensus to finally move ahead with it can be
found at the discussion terminating in this message:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-September/035147.html
Signed-off-by: Matt
As discussed in the following thread:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-August/034755.html
the existing plane assignment in the DRM backend is vulnerable to
accidental masking of the intended fullscreen surface. This change
adds a simple stateful memory to the plane
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using connector name to describe the connected monitor doesn't sound
> right to me.
I didn't really like it either. Thanks for the suggestions below.
>
> If you actually need the connector name in clients then
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> No, that's all the way broken. I assume the only way this hasn't yet
> bitten us is that the background in stock desktop-shell is a SHM-only
> client, so won't get promoted to a plane.
>
> That should be fixed in the
On embedded systems, EDID is typically unavailble for connectors on buses
such as LVDS or DSI. This change enhances the original opportunistic
naming done in 2b2092adb499d8cdc10390cf19876706bcfe69cb to report the
make and model of an output according to the KMS connector (e.g., "DSI-1")
if no
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As discussed in the following thread:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-August/034755.html
>
> the existing plane assignment in the DRM backend is vulnerable to
definition public, new functions are introduced for attaching
listeners to these signals.
Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
libweston-desktop/libweston-desktop.h | 3 +++
libweston-desktop/surface.c | 12
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> It can't be correct to raise it to the cursor plane either, since both
> cursor and overlay planes strictly stack above the scanout plane. I
> guess this would read a lot easier with:
> if (picked_scanout)
>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> That more or less makes sense at the moment, though there has been
> quite a bit of work on less insane remoting within Weston. And then
> GNOME is using PipeWire for this. But anyway, you probably know this
> and it's
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> Here's a cleaned-up and fully-tested version of the atomic series.
Hi;
Just wondering: do you maintain these in a publicly fetchable repo
somewhere? I didn't turn up anything after some light searching --
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> + fd = shm_open("/wayland-cursor-shared", O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0);
> + shm_unlink("/wayland-cursor-shared");
This seems to be a departure from the anonymous behavior that
mkstemp() previously
It would be nice for non-session uses of Weston (embedded systems) if
the controlling TTY didn't need to be manually supplied.
Has anybody suggested using something like VT_OPENQRY in the
weston-launcher code to pick a TTY if one wasn't manually given? (Or
if that's too auto-magic for taste here,
Ping
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As discussed on
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-August/034720.html,
> it's useful for the shell implementation to know when these change,
> for example to rel
I'm having some trouble joining the Wayland channel on Freenode. Is
there a specific person to contact about that?
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
allow clients' wl_display_connect() to find the compositor's listening
socket somewhere outside of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR. For a full account, see
the discussion beginning here:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:11:43 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonas, Pekka,
>>
>> I have no objection to making the tweaks that Jonas mentions, b
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 2:23 PM, ferreiradaselva
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My first time posting here (sorry if I'm posting on the wrong place).
You're in the right place. Welcome!
>
> I'm working on this window creation framework
>
, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:23:55PM -0600, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
>> allow clients' wl_display_conne
Hi Jonas (and Pekka),
How well does v4 address your requests?
-Matt
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:11:43 -0600
>&
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:54:54 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system comp
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:23:55 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system comp
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 09:36:29 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system comp
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
allow clients' wl_display_connect() to find the compositor's listening
socket somewhere outside of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR. For a full account, see
the discussion beginning here:
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:36:29AM -0600, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:20:42 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system comp
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:20:42 -0600
>> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
allow clients' wl_display_connect() to find the compositor's listening
socket somewhere outside of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR. For a full account, see
the discussion beginning here:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:20:42 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
>>
>> In order to support system comp
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 10:07:28 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:13:42 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What sort of testing on this series would be most helpful? I figure that
> > you and pq have
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Add support for the GBM_BO_IMPORT_FD_MODIFIER path, which allows us to
> import multi-plane dmabufs, as well as format modifiers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
> ---
> configure.ac
What sort of testing on this series would be most helpful? I figure that
you and pq have most of the code review covered, so the main contribution I
can make with the hardware available to me is to exercise this on
consumer-grade systems like Macbooks with Intel display controllers. Are
there are
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Quentin Glidic
<sardemff7+wayl...@sardemff7.net> wrote:
> On 11/7/17 6:01 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> <eu...@de.adit-jv.com> wrote:
>
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:42:42 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3 November 2017 at 07:33, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>> > - when the current socket search fails, add
From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@garmin.com>
In order to support system compositor instances, it is necessary to
allow clients' wl_display_connect() to find the compositor's listening
socket somewhere outside of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR. For a full account, see
the discussion beginning here:
There has been a surge of recent interest in the details of using Wayland
on nontraditional systems that don't have the normal notion of human-user
login sessions. Discussions are ongoing about the details of how to manage
the allocation of TTYs and Weston's vision of the best practices for
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:44:50 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There has been a surge of recent interest in the details of using Wayland
> > on nontraditional s
Hi Pekka,
What do you think is a good amount of time to allow for people to
respond to your call for acks/nacks?
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:47:39 +0200 Pekka Paalanen said:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
> Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor. Because it is
> violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell interface.
>
> Therefore, we have to at least support wl_shell
Hi all,
The thing I'd like to arrange is for a device which is otherwise a
valid keyboard, not to get automatically vacuumed up into the Weston
DRM backend's usage of libinput.
Nowadays, Weston has delegated most of its former firsthand extraction
of UDev properties to libinput. Nothing exists
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Quentin Glidic
<sardemff7+wayl...@sardemff7.net> wrote:
> On 12/8/17 11:22 AM, Quentin Glidic wrote:
>>
>> From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
>>
>> As discussed on
>>
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/arch
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:57:39 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The thing I'd like to arrange is for a device which is otherwise a
>> vali
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:10:02 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the very reason why ivi-shell ever came to be was that the operating
> environment of graphical applications in IVI was so different from a
> normal desktop, that it was simply impossible to have desktop
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:37:37 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be nice for non-session uses of Weston (embedded systems) if
>> the controlling TTY di
I'm not at all familiar with the internal implementation of ivi-shell, so I
can't give much meaningful review. But I am very much in favor of this
patch series. Without wl_shell and xdg_shell support, I've never been able
to really give ivi-shell serious consideration on my products. The ability
root.
> It has not been written for anything else.
>
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> > > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoosier
> > > Sent: Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 14:28
> > > To:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:20:42 +0100
> Emre Ucan wrote:
>
> > weston does not need to be root.
> > It requires adjusting ownership on the given tty device.
> >
> > If weston does not have proper
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2018 07:55:10 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> wrote
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2018 23:38:55 +0100
> adlo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 14:12 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > >
> > > what's the backtrace from gdb for that?
> > >
> >
> > Is this any help?
>
Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
---
libweston/log.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Any takers to accept this one?
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
> null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier <m
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> did you intend to reply on list? Please CC if you did.
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:35:56 -0500
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:59 AM Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:10 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:05:58 -0500
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Pekka's recent comments about wanting to enable set-top boxes built with
> > libweston to do DRM content got me to wondering:
&
Hi Deepak,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Deepak Jois wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have read the Wayland docs and skimmed through the API reference,
> and I am trying to understand some concepts better. The questions
> below are probably a bit naive, but I appreciate any
>
HI Pekka,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:26:04 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 07:05:13 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > HI Pekka,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com&
This question is mainly meant for the input device developers that hang out
here.
Does anybody know of a de facto network protocol that should be used for
relaying input devices across a network? I don't have full remote-desktop
situations in mind -- this is narrowly a question about devices with
On Dec 29, 2017 15:32, "Mantas Mikulėnas" <graw...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> The approach that you and Pekka most recently put on record here:
>
> * User=foo
> * PAMName=weston
>
&
Hi Lennart,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:25:35 +0100
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 01.12.17 13:42, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> > > > > This is racy, as the session ID is
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:49 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:09:28 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lennart,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> <eu..
Hi;
I'm interested in getting an external display to make testing the
touch-centric changes in Weston easier when working from a PC. Does anybody
have recommendations for a good model that attaches over HDMI+USB that
supports a reasonably good resolution and reports a standard slotted
multitouch
Hi,
Unless you're using an unreleased version of Weston, I think you're
probably running into a bug that we fixed a few months ago in which
wl_buffer::release() events were prone to sit undispatched in the
server's outgoing queue until some other event happened to need
transmitted.
-Matt
On
Here's the discussion and patch that addressed the issue I was mentioning:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-September/035191.html
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless you're using an unreleased ve
I encounter another "bad" behavior related to multiple firings of the UDev
'add' event for a given input node.
Typically on modest embedded systems, you do not want to run the exhaustive
'udevadm trigger' during the main booting sequence. That causes hundreds or
thousands of UDev nodes to be
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:37:58 +0000
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 08:10 Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
e Base (ADITG/ESB)
> >
> > Tel. +49 5121 49 6921
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> > > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Peter Hutterer
> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2018 06:27
> &
ngineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)
> >
> > Tel. +49 5121 49 6921
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Peter Hutterer [mailto:peter.hutte...@who-t.net]
> > > Sent: Freitag, 6. April 2018 04:29
> > > To: Friedrich, Eugen (ADITG/ESB)
>
, 2018, 09:38 Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:46:46 -0500
> > Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am very
ouchscreen
got pegged to the correct physical output. I have the feeling that I just
overlooked some aspect of configuration about this.
-Matt
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 09:38 Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:30 A
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 08:10 Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Philipp Kerling <pkerl...@casix.org>
> wrote:
>
>> > Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the
>> > presence of a touch inp
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:46:46 -0500
> Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am very much in favor of the overall approach on this patch series.
>> I've experienced every sin
I am very much in favor of the overall approach on this patch series.
I've experienced every single one of the problems described in this
summary, and my company currently resorts to maintaining a hacky
out-of-tree calibration tool to paper over these problems.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:00 AM,
Hi all,
Pekka's recent comments about wanting to enable set-top boxes built with
libweston to do DRM content got me to wondering:
Who all is using libweston directly (as opposed to running /usr/bin/weston
possibly with custom shells plugins or similar)? For my own purposes, I
just use the full
(Fair warning, I've never used GitLab other than anonymously before.)
I'd like to be able to get email notifications about all the PR's (their
initial posting, subsequent code reviews, acceptance, etc) as a way to
simulate the former bird's eye view that was possible when all patches
passed
Hi all,
A while ago, LWN.net ran an article (https://lwn.net/Articles/702075/) that
overviewed the Wayland-based display architecture used by ChromeOS to allow
its containerized Android runtimes to forward graphics surfaces along to
the ChromeOS compositor.
Does anybody know where to find the
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo