On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:29:48 -0400
Simon Ser wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:31:48 +0200
> > Johan Klokkhammer Helsing wrote:
> >
> > > Some clients rely on the physical size to determine the physical DPI.
> > > With the
> > > previous implementation, we would report 1px==1mm, which is a
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:31:48 +0200
> Johan Klokkhammer Helsing wrote:
>
> > Some clients rely on the physical size to determine the physical DPI. With
> > the
> > previous implementation, we would report 1px==1mm, which is a DPI of 25.4,
> > which is incredibly low.
> >
> > The problem is
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:31:48 +0200
Johan Klokkhammer Helsing wrote:
> Some clients rely on the physical size to determine the physical DPI. With the
> previous implementation, we would report 1px==1mm, which is a DPI of 25.4,
> which is incredibly low.
>
> The problem is solved by setting a
Some clients rely on the physical size to determine the physical DPI. With the
previous implementation, we would report 1px==1mm, which is a DPI of 25.4,
which is incredibly low.
The problem is solved by setting a physical size so the DPI is close to 72
instead. If the output is scaled, the DPI
