Re: [PATCH wayland 4/8] fixup! scanner: use c99 initializers for the request/events arrays

2018-07-04 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:19:03 +0100
Emil Velikov  wrote:

> On 3 July 2018 at 12:28, Pekka Paalanen  wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:49:41 +0100
> > Emil Velikov  wrote:
> >  
> >> ---
> >>  tests/data/example-code.c   | 238 
> >> 
> >>  tests/data/small-code-core.c|   8 +-
> >>  tests/data/small-code.c |   8 +-
> >>  tests/data/small-private-code.c |   8 +-
> >>  4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)  
> >  
> >> diff --git a/tests/data/small-private-code.c 
> >> b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> >> index 35fa653..84f77de 100644
> >> --- a/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> >> +++ b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> >> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ static const struct wl_interface *types[] = {
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  static const struct wl_message intf_A_requests[] = {
> >> - { "rq1", "sun", types + 0 },
> >> - { "rq2", "nsiufho", types + 1 },
> >> - { "destroy", "", types + 0 },
> >> + { .name = "rq1", .signature = "sun", .types = [0] },
> >> + { .name = "rq2", .signature = "nsiufho", .types = [1] },
> >> + { .name = "destroy", .signature = "", .types = [0] },
> >>  };  
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this change doesn't look more readable to me than the old version.
> > Adding the field names only clutters things and makes the lines longer
> > for no added information: it is always the exact same fields set in the
> > same order, and there are only three of them.
> >
> > The change from 'types + i' to '[i]' seems ok though.
> >  
> Seems like these dead trivial patches are inciting some bike-shedding.
> Proceed as you wish, sadly I'm out of patience.

Ok, let's drop these all these, continue with other matters.


Thanks,
pq


pgpWnno5I0Ril.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel


Re: [PATCH wayland 4/8] fixup! scanner: use c99 initializers for the request/events arrays

2018-07-03 Thread Emil Velikov
On 3 July 2018 at 12:28, Pekka Paalanen  wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:49:41 +0100
> Emil Velikov  wrote:
>
>> ---
>>  tests/data/example-code.c   | 238 
>> 
>>  tests/data/small-code-core.c|   8 +-
>>  tests/data/small-code.c |   8 +-
>>  tests/data/small-private-code.c |   8 +-
>>  4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/tests/data/small-private-code.c 
>> b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
>> index 35fa653..84f77de 100644
>> --- a/tests/data/small-private-code.c
>> +++ b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
>> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ static const struct wl_interface *types[] = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static const struct wl_message intf_A_requests[] = {
>> - { "rq1", "sun", types + 0 },
>> - { "rq2", "nsiufho", types + 1 },
>> - { "destroy", "", types + 0 },
>> + { .name = "rq1", .signature = "sun", .types = [0] },
>> + { .name = "rq2", .signature = "nsiufho", .types = [1] },
>> + { .name = "destroy", .signature = "", .types = [0] },
>>  };
>
> Hi,
>
> this change doesn't look more readable to me than the old version.
> Adding the field names only clutters things and makes the lines longer
> for no added information: it is always the exact same fields set in the
> same order, and there are only three of them.
>
> The change from 'types + i' to '[i]' seems ok though.
>
Seems like these dead trivial patches are inciting some bike-shedding.
Proceed as you wish, sadly I'm out of patience.

Peace
Emil
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel


Re: [PATCH wayland 4/8] fixup! scanner: use c99 initializers for the request/events arrays

2018-07-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:49:41 +0100
Emil Velikov  wrote:

> ---
>  tests/data/example-code.c   | 238 
> 
>  tests/data/small-code-core.c|   8 +-
>  tests/data/small-code.c |   8 +-
>  tests/data/small-private-code.c |   8 +-
>  4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/tests/data/small-private-code.c b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> index 35fa653..84f77de 100644
> --- a/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> +++ b/tests/data/small-private-code.c
> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ static const struct wl_interface *types[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct wl_message intf_A_requests[] = {
> - { "rq1", "sun", types + 0 },
> - { "rq2", "nsiufho", types + 1 },
> - { "destroy", "", types + 0 },
> + { .name = "rq1", .signature = "sun", .types = [0] },
> + { .name = "rq2", .signature = "nsiufho", .types = [1] },
> + { .name = "destroy", .signature = "", .types = [0] },
>  };

Hi,

this change doesn't look more readable to me than the old version.
Adding the field names only clutters things and makes the lines longer
for no added information: it is always the exact same fields set in the
same order, and there are only three of them.

The change from 'types + i' to '[i]' seems ok though.


Thanks,
pq


pgphdt0V4eSKm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel