On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:37:58 +
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 08:10 Matt Hoosier wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Philipp Kerling
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:20:08PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:11:24 +
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> > Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the presence
> > of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 08:10 Matt Hoosier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Philipp Kerling
> wrote:
>
>> > Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the
>> > presence of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Philipp Kerling wrote:
> > Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the
> > presence of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this
> > series, but current Weston is far ahead of what my embedded devices
> > will
> Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the
> presence of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this
> series, but current Weston is far ahead of what my embedded devices
> will do; so I'm in the position of mostly relying on the desktop for
> testing.
I'm not
On Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:11:24 +
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the presence
> of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this series, but
> current Weston is far ahead of what my embedded devices will do;
Do you happen to know of a good readymade program that fakes the presence
of a touch input device with uinput? I'd love to test this series, but
current Weston is far ahead of what my embedded devices will do; so I'm in
the position of mostly relying on the desktop for testing.
On Fri, Mar 23,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:58:47 -0700
Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:33:10 -0700
> > Jason Gerecke wrote:
> >
> >> Nice! Do you think its reasonable to
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:33:10 -0700
> Jason Gerecke wrote:
>
>> Nice! Do you think its reasonable to extend the allowed use of this
>> protocol to other kinds of direct-input devices? I don't see
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:33:10 -0700
Jason Gerecke wrote:
> Nice! Do you think its reasonable to extend the allowed use of this
> protocol to other kinds of direct-input devices? I don't see anything
> which would prevent this protocol from working equally well to
> calibrate
Nice! Do you think its reasonable to extend the allowed use of this
protocol to other kinds of direct-input devices? I don't see anything
which would prevent this protocol from working equally well to
calibrate the pen input for a tablet PC or Cintiq for example. The
compositor would need to
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:46:46 -0500
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
>> I am very much in favor of the overall approach on this patch series.
>> I've experienced every single one of the problems described
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:46:46 -0500
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> I am very much in favor of the overall approach on this patch series.
> I've experienced every single one of the problems described in this
> summary, and my company currently resorts to maintaining a hacky
>
I am very much in favor of the overall approach on this patch series.
I've experienced every single one of the problems described in this
summary, and my company currently resorts to maintaining a hacky
out-of-tree calibration tool to paper over these problems.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:00 AM,
14 matches
Mail list logo