[web2py] Re: IMPORTANT - NEED HELP: more speed improvements to be tested

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Haag
The following code is broken in trunk: db = DAL('sqlite://test.sqlite') db.define_table('t',Field('x')) db.t.insert(x=1) db(db.t).select(db.t.id,db.t.x+1).first()(db.t.id) Throws AttributeError: 'Row' object has no attribute 'id' The point seems to be the _extra entry created in the row object

[web2py] Re: IMPORTANT - NEED HELP: more speed improvements to be tested

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Haag
WE NEED INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS AGAINST 1.99.7. Here is the code to benchmark: - import time db=DAL() db.define_table('person',Field('name')) db.test.insert(name='one') db.person.insert(name='one') n = 10 t0 = time.time() for k in range(n): y = db.person.name

[web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-24 Thread Daniel Haag
Just a small thing: Is it possible to have the -g option (the groups to be picked by the worker) when calling the worker with the -K arg from the main web2py.py? maybe somthing like python web2py.py -K appname(group1,group2,...) Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 20:36:38 UTC schrieb Niphlod:

[web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-24 Thread Daniel Haag
UTC+2, Daniel Haag wrote: Just a small thing: Is it possible to have the -g option (the groups to be picked by the worker) when calling the worker with the -K arg from the main web2py.py? maybe somthing like python web2py.py -K appname(group1,group2,...) --

[web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-14 Thread Daniel Haag
) that is the useful information. I wouldn't consider this an issue, actually it's a feature, isn't it? Should the scheduler report only the output and not the traceback for TIMEOUTted tasks? On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 3:25:13 PM UTC+2, Daniel Haag wrote: Hi Niphlod, thanks for the great work

Re: [web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-13 Thread Daniel Haag
with this feature, if you saw this feature implemented already ? Well, actually I did not, but that doesn't mean a lot as I didn't have the requirement of a scheduler in a web framework until recently... On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 3:25:13 PM UTC+2, Daniel Haag wrote: Hi Niphlod, thanks

Re: [web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-13 Thread Daniel Haag
Am 14.08.2012 00:45 schrieb Niphlod niph...@gmail.com: On Monday, August 13, 2012 4:44:18 PM UTC+2, Daniel Haag wrote: I don't know if it would work this way but I would be glad if you could give me some feedback (its actually just a proof of concept - but I did already test it a little

[web2py] Re: Scheduler: help us test it while learning

2012-08-08 Thread Daniel Haag
Hi Niphlod, thanks for the great work with the scheduler, I'm using it in a project where it handles lots of big data imports into a database and the migration to your version was without any problems. On thing catched my eye in the old version and it still seems to be a problem/missing