http://www.web2py.com/examples/static/web2py_vs_others.pdf
2012/8/1 Michele Comitini
> Less boilerplate code.
> Sane defaults.
>
> mic
>
>
> 2012/8/1 vinicius...@gmail.com
>
> We2bpy strengths over Django:
>>
>> 1) Automatic migrations. It enforces baby steps design just
>> out-of-the-box. Sou
web2py has a more flexible template engine, you can use Python there and
does not need to create a tons of template filters to get simple things
done. Also in Django the template language sucks a lot because of the
limitations.
Let me give an example:
To build a map using google maps API you have
Less boilerplate code.
Sane defaults.
mic
2012/8/1 vinicius...@gmail.com
> We2bpy strengths over Django:
>
> 1) Automatic migrations. It enforces baby steps design just
> out-of-the-box. South migrations is a powerful tool, but Django doesn't
> have it natively yet.
> 2) Web2py shows a generic
We2bpy strengths over Django:
1) Automatic migrations. It enforces baby steps design just
out-of-the-box. South migrations is a powerful tool, but Django doesn't
have it natively yet.
2) Web2py shows a generic template when you don't have one created. Yet,
baby steps guaranteed.
I see these
Tonight I'm going to present my little social-network to a user-group.
I'm going to show them my code, some slides, the website, the mobile apps
and tell them when Django isn't as good as web2py.
Are there any particular features of web2py you would recommend I
highlight? - Also, are there any ma
5 matches
Mail list logo
