That's great.
There will not be so many records, so first() should work in this case but
i really appreciate the added insight, that is really useful to know.
Thank you.
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 2:43:59 PM UTC-8, Niphlod wrote:
>
> I second this BUT I still want to point out that .firs
I second this BUT I still want to point out that .first() is a great tool
but it works at python level. In a "people" table holding 8M results,
you'll wait a lot. Use - WHENEVER and WHEREVER possible - orderby.
db(db.people.city == 'London').select(orderby=db.people.age,
limitby=(0,1)).first()
You could do
db(db.people.city == "London").select(orderby=db.people.age).first()
>
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 8:12:31 AM UTC-5, UG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If i have the following table
> ID
> fist_name
> last_name
> city
> age
>
>
> I use the MIN to find the lowest age
>
> youngest = db(db.pe
3 matches
Mail list logo
