May be we can have a tab in web2py page or slice with "feature request" n have
people submit ideas n others vote for it. If number of votes exceed 100 it goes
to a priority list or something. Just some thoughts...
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http
I already said I wanted to contribute as a user aiming at designing a
completely functional app. If you feel this isn't enough of a contribution
then we disagree. I don't have the energy / time and possibly the skills
to participate in Web2py api development and at the same time to
write/test
I share your frustration Niphlod and I am with you on this. I see all these
posts about os, boy with a new toy but barely about how we do certain
things given what's already there.
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 3:18:12 PM UTC-4, Niphlod wrote:
>
> I don't want to push anyone away but if the und
I don't want to push anyone away but if the underlying statement is "I need
this ready to go" and a library-framework-whatever doesn't contain it, then
there's really nothing anyone can do. Nobody ever said that web2py is a
silver bullet (nor is it django, flask, express, sails, rails, cakephp,
I thought GIS/Geolocation is something fancy / highly desirable ? It also
implies some important aspects of life ..
the GIS function i miss is *st_transform* (POSTGIS) which i can test in
depth if implemented. It won't be a drama if it's not as there are
workarounds via *pyproj* or *gda
I believe the original web2py GIS sponsor (http://sahanafoundation.org/)
uses it in their products, which are production ready.
Expanding it depends on:
- existence of desired functionality in the supported databases
- desirability of said functions for the community
- willingness to contribute,
too bad
do you think the existing implementation is still usable in a production
context or is it too dangerous / unstable ?
there's a python package called *pyproj* that might offer some workarounds
to transform points coordinatesand "stay in touch" with the dal
--
Resources:
- ht
nobody pushed GIS and frankly the support for it is scattered. There hasn't
been an holistic approach in the implementation.
IMHO you should not rely on anyone but yourself to add support on pydal.
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 9:57:52 AM UTC+2, Pierre wrote:
>
> nobody knows or nobody wants to ans
nobody knows or nobody wants to answer...?
well that's not encouraging for people interested in GIS...
and it might cause an unpleasant feeling that this GIS-thing is
down..correct me if this is a false assumption
am sorry if i did ask the wrong question or if i hurted someone's f
9 matches
Mail list logo
