Hm ok, I think that threading error is just a red-herring. If you feel
comfortable enough, I could try and import your setup into a spare gear on
my account and triage it that way. You can take an exact export with the
rhc snapshot command and I can import it and see if I can pin down what's
up
Hello, Andrew!
I'm using https, and my error logs I am giving this message:
[Sun Dec 30 00:13:12 2012] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running
as context unconfined_u:system_r:openshift_t:s0:c5,c110
[Sun Dec 30 00:13:12 2012] [notice] mod_bw : Memory Allocated 32 bytes
(each conf takes 32
Gustavo,
Make sure that you're accessing it via https, I've noticed that if I click
on the admin button from the main page accessed via http, it uses whatever
transport protocol that was specified to get there.
If you're already doing this I'd take a look at the web2py logs in
$OPENSHIFT_PYTH
Hi Adrew, I followed these steps and was able to deploy the web2py, and it
works! ... I did with version 2.3.2
My only problem is that the web2py admin panel is disabled.
I created the file "parameters_443.py" and put the password hash, but still
the message appears "admin disabled because unable
No, it's just a domain name. If it's of interested I am self hosting on a
quad core Intel with 4 GB RAM on Linux Mint.
Simon
On 22 August 2012 23:18, Stef Mientki wrote:
> is this really an Arduino,
> which chip, what clock frequency, which OS ?
> It seems much faster than the Raspberry-PI !
>
is this really an Arduino,
which chip, what clock frequency, which OS ?
It seems much faster than the Raspberry-PI !
cheers,
Stef
On 20-08-2012 21:12, Simon Carr wrote:
I think I have made a mistake with SWVPS, I would suggest that no one touch them. I had no
response from them after sending my
Did you say you were in UK? That loads really fast for me, here in the
US. Awesome.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Simon Carr wrote:
> I think I have made a mistake with SWVPS, I would suggest that no one touch
> them. I had no response from them after sending my money, even though it was
> les
If it looks too good to be true...
On Monday, August 20, 2012 3:12:43 PM UTC-4, Simon Carr wrote:
>
> I think I have made a mistake with SWVPS, I would suggest that no one
> touch them. I had no response from them after sending my money, even though
> it was less than $20. I have sent them two e
:-)
On Monday, 20 August 2012 14:12:43 UTC-5, Simon Carr wrote:
>
> I think I have made a mistake with SWVPS, I would suggest that no one
> touch them. I had no response from them after sending my money, even though
> it was less than $20. I have sent them two emails to what is supposed to be
>
I think I have made a mistake with SWVPS, I would suggest that no one touch
them. I had no response from them after sending my money, even though it
was less than $20. I have sent them two emails to what is supposed to be
24/7 tech support and got no response. I am writing my $20 off, but don't
won
Andrew, thanks for your response. I will take a look at wsgi folder and the
contents in it.
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:39:52 PM UTC-4, Andrew wrote:
>
> A little different in order.
>
> Do all the openshift stuff first, then download web2py and copy it into
> the wsgi folder.
>
> I would
A little different in order.
Do all the openshift stuff first, then download web2py and copy it into the
wsgi folder.
I would suggest using the application file I provide on the github repo and
modify:
This:
sys.path.append(os.path.join(os.environ['OPENSHIFT_REPO_DIR'], 'libs',
'gluon'))
to
Hi Andrew,
Thanks very much for your reply. Let me see if I have understood you
correctly (about not having to modify even the gluon part). Assuming that I
am not using any extra modules do you think the following steps will get me
on openshift. I am trying to understand how to do this *without
Hi curious,
The only thing I really modified was taking gluon out of the web2py dir and
putting it in the libs dir (and really that doesn't even need to be done, I
was just trying to confirm to the openshift project structuring when I was
first experimenting). Other then that, you can just make
Alec,
I was thinking of trying out Red Hat Openshift and came across your
repository. While I have not tried your instructions yet, and they will
most probably work, unfortunately, the things that you modified in the
web2py folder is not clear from those instructions. If it is not too
complica
Price and Spec. I have had a few VPS's before and been amazed at how little
connections you can have before you run out of memory. As an example a
256MB VPS can only have one or two visitors on a wordpress site before it
grinds to a halt. Most ISP's offer only 1GB before they start getting too
expe
I'm using Red Hat OpenShift.
How to setup web2py on it: https://github.com/prelegalwonder/openshift_web2py/
It is free for the moment, not sure when they're going to start charging for it.
Major disadvantage is that the way they have setup git means the whole
site goes down everytime you push. T
Wow, those are great prices for VPS.
Was there anything besides price that made you choose them?
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 5:42:32 AM UTC-4, Simon Carr wrote:
>
> I have just found this service
>
> http://webkeepers.com
>
> I think i will give their medium service a try on the one month contrac
In the end i went for another option. swvps.com the reason being they were
also cheap but an option to locate my vps in the uk. The uk option was an
extra $4.99 a month but still cheap.
Simon.
On 19 Aug 2012 10:42, "Simon Carr" wrote:
> I have just found this service
>
> http://webkeepers.com
I have just found this service
http://webkeepers.com
I think i will give their medium service a try on the one month contract
and see how it goes. The 4gb version seems very reasonable even on the
monthly rates and better still if i decide to stick with them for a year.
My only worry is that i a
Bruno,
Can you please comment on how your Linode instances compare with
pythonanywhere in terms of responsiveness and speed? Are you saying that
you would use PAW because of their awesome customer service, prices, ease
of hosting, or do you also find the application performance better on PAW?
Tha
Hi Simon,
As Bruno has mentioned it is very easy to get your app on
Pythonanywhere. They have great customer service and, hence they are a
good possible option. The only problem is that currently the hosting
on Pythonanywhere is kind of slow. But I suppose that will be fixed
once they move to ngin
http://rochacbruno.com.br/web2py-on-pythonanywhere/
--
I use Linode (1024 and 2048 instances) powered by NGINX and UWSGI.
Also I am now hosting web2pyslices.com sponsored by
http://pythonanywhere.com, I have plans to move to Python Anywhere when
they release the PRO plan with Postgres.
But if did not needed postgres, I would like to use PythonAnywher
After a few weeks of getting to know web2py i have decided that it should
become one of the development tools in my tool belt.
The only thing that is stopping me moving on however is hosting options. I am
going to take a look at app engine as one option but i need to know that i can
also deplo
25 matches
Mail list logo
