as I said, definitely not stable nor released.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 7:34:09 PM UTC+1, Paolo Valleri wrote:
>
> What about https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/commits/python3 ?
>
>
> On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:19 PM UTC+1, Niphlod wrote:
>>
>> m2crypto port for py3 are
What about https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/commits/python3 ?
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:19 PM UTC+1, Niphlod wrote:
>
> m2crypto port for py3 are available (although not strictly official).
> The contrib module for x509 auth stands on it so, on py3, it MAY not work,
> but it's
m2crypto port for py3 are available (although not strictly official).
The contrib module for x509 auth stands on it so, on py3, it MAY not work,
but it's not web2py's fault (BTW, if you have an alternative, that works
for py2 and py3 we'll be glad to adopt it)
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at
Does not having m2crypto mean auth is less secure or does it just effect
x509 authentication?
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:15:08 PM UTC-5, Niphlod wrote:
>
> the same gain moving any piece of code from python 2 to python 3 (read on
> the interwebs, there are a few).
> at least now you can
the same gain moving any piece of code from python 2 to python 3 (read on
the interwebs, there are a few).
at least now you can choose and have web2py not standing in the way.
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 12:34:39 AM UTC+1, Ramos wrote:
>
> what is the gain moving to python 3?
>
> 2016-11-05
what is the gain moving to python 3?
2016-11-05 17:59 GMT+00:00 Leonel Câmara :
> web2py is almost completely python 3 compatible. You can follow the issue
> here: https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353
>
> --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> -
6 matches
Mail list logo