On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 4:21:10 PM UTC-8, 黄祥 wrote:
>
> agree, learn from several web2py app on github some of them didn't include
> the private folders
> btw github now offering private repo for free, so if you want to keep it
> on just set it in the private repo
>
> best regards
>
Thank you!
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, 6:46 PM Dave S
>
> On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 3:10:22 PM UTC-8, Vlad wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>> you mentioned "Sanitize private/appconfig.ini" - could you please comment
>> on it -
>> I am not sure how this file is used by web2py, but seems that it may have
>>
agree, learn from several web2py app on github some of them didn't include
the private folders
btw github now offering private repo for free, so if you want to keep it on
just set it in the private repo
best regards
stifan
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book
On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 3:10:22 PM UTC-8, Vlad wrote:
>
> Dave,
> you mentioned "Sanitize private/appconfig.ini" - could you please comment
> on it -
> I am not sure how this file is used by web2py, but seems that it may have
> some private info (though has some generics for me
Dave,
you mentioned "Sanitize private/appconfig.ini" - could you please comment
on it -
I am not sure how this file is used by web2py, but seems that it may have
some private info (though has some generics for me now).
Should I just exclude it from git? Is it getting recreated by w2p or...
On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 6:33:14 AM UTC-8, Vlad wrote:
>
> Got it,
> thank you very much.
> Learning git now - it's so messy and unstructured as far as learning curve
> :) I guess once I get it, it becomes quick and easy...
>
>
In my opinion, git is ugly, but then I went from rcs to
Got it,
thank you very much.
Learning git now - it's so messy and unstructured as far as learning curve
:) I guess once I get it, it becomes quick and easy...
On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 7:21:55 PM UTC-5, Dave S wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:45:27 PM UTC-8, Vlad wrote:
>>
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:45:27 PM UTC-8, Vlad wrote:
>
> Oh, I didn't express myself precisely: I am asking about Github - I am
> setting up a Github repository and wondering what exactly from the app
> directory should go in there - without extra files and without missing
> files -
Got it,
Thank you
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 4:48 PM 黄祥 it depends on what you want to have version record of your files (better
> to put it all web2py apps on github)
> $ tree web2py/applications/web2pyapp
> web2py/applications/web2pyapp
> |-- ABOUT [if any]
> |-- LICENSE [if any]
> |-- __init__.py
>
it depends on what you want to have version record of your files (better to
put it all web2py apps on github)
$ tree web2py/applications/web2pyapp
web2py/applications/web2pyapp
|-- ABOUT [if any]
|-- LICENSE [if any]
|-- __init__.py
|-- controllers
|-- cron [if any]
|-- languages
|-- models
|--
Oh, I didn't express myself precisely: I am asking about Github - I am
setting up a Github repository and wondering what exactly from the app
directory should go in there - without extra files and without missing
files - to preserve complete app/set
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 2:51 PM 黄祥 wrote:
>
for pack or unpack thing it's use tar
ref:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/khiGuJYxHpo/clEEU7n3VGEJ
best regards,
stifan
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
-
If anyone is interested I found assembla.com which allows unlimited
repositories, with unlimited members for both public and private projects.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Massimo Di Pierro
massimo.dipie...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem at all Daniel, I welcome the discussion. I am just
No problem at all Daniel, I welcome the discussion. I am just saying
do not get upset if I am slow on this side. ;-)
On Dec 22, 12:59 am, Daniel Aguayo Catalán daniel.agu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
I hate all changes related to this topic. This is because I have to
learn a
mdipierro escribió:
I somebody wants to keep an official mirror there I have no
objection. I prefer to stick with mercurial on Google because
mercurial is 100% python.
On Apr 5, 1:53 am, elffikkelff...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I use a few project stored on github, and I find it easier to
Daniel Aguayo Catalán escribió:
mdipierro escribió:
I somebody wants to keep an official mirror there I have no
objection. I prefer to stick with mercurial on Google because
mercurial is 100% python.
On Apr 5, 1:53 am, elffikkelff...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I use a few project stored on
My problem with bitbucket is the 5 cap for free private, if you are wanting
to use git and keep the projects public I recommend gitorious.
2011/12/21 Daniel Aguayo Catalán daniel.agu...@gmail.com
Daniel Aguayo Catalán escribió:
mdipierro escribió:
I somebody wants to keep an official
the 5 users cap is only for free private repos, not for public repos.
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:14:51 +0530, Bruce Wade bruce.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
My problem with bitbucket is the 5 cap for free private, if you are
wanting
to use git and keep the projects public I recommend gitorious.
Bruce Wade escribió:
My problem with bitbucket is the 5 cap for free private, if you are
wanting to use git and keep the projects public I recommend gitorious.
I like gitorious because it's FLOSS and 'eats its own dog food'
(gitorious code is hosted on gitorious), but private projects **for
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:44:51 AM UTC-5, Detectedstealth wrote:
My problem with bitbucket is the 5 cap for free private
At least they have a free option for private repositories -- github does
not. Does anyone offer free private repositories with unlimited
collaborators?
Short Answer: Because that's what the developers wanted and agreed to.
Search the web2py-developer group for the months long discussion on
changing it if you really want to know
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 10:20:38 AM UTC-5, Daniel Aguayo wrote:
I know that web2py doesn't need a private
I hate all changes related to this topic. This is because I have to
learn a new system and do extra work to move stuff around. There was a
lot of push for git and github so we did it.
Please, let's not open this can of worms again. The costs of changing
outweighs the benefits.
Massimo
On Dec
Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
I hate all changes related to this topic. This is because I have to
learn a new system and do extra work to move stuff around. There was a
lot of push for git and github so we did it.
Please, let's not open this can of worms again. The costs of changing
outweighs the
because i already know and use git everyday for personal use and at
work. So i know it. in mercurial i kinda know how to pull the updates.
heh. just never really used it much. Not saying it isnt easy to learn
or better/worse. Just that im already using git. if the core was in
git i could so git
In the past a user has posted a version of web2py on bitbucket. The
user did not keep it in sync not updated and this has confused some
prospective users.
So please add a clear notice that links the official page and declares
when your code is updated manually (I so assume) and may get out of
A lot of code is stored in mercurial so it might be worthwhile to learn it.
It's quite easy.
If you don't have mercurial installed, install in your preferred way
(apt-get, easy_install, pip).
Then you only need a couple commands:
To grab Web2py:
$ hg clone https://code.google.com/p/web2py/
yea i have it installed already. Im thinking maybe at this point it
might be easier to just use hg. But there is an app out there that
will take a mercurial repos and convert everything into a git repo
including commits and the full history. I tried it at home and it
works great. cant think of the
be aware that google code hosting now supports git..
On Jul 20, 4:44 am, luckysmack luckysm...@gmail.com wrote:
Well i was going to for the original. But it being so out of date, i
thought i would just take the mercurial branch and use a tool to
convert the code and its branches with history
oh yea? well thats handy. am i able to fork/clone a mercurial repo as
a git repo?
On Jul 20, 4:33 am, blackthorne francisco@gmail.com wrote:
be aware that google code hosting now supports git..
On Jul 20, 4:44 am, luckysmack luckysm...@gmail.com wrote:
Well i was going to for the
On Jul 20, 2011, at 7:05 PM, luckysmack wrote:
oh yea? well thats handy. am i able to fork/clone a mercurial repo as
a git repo?
Why git, btw? Seems like sticking with hg would be more straightforward.
On Jul 20, 4:33 am, blackthorne francisco@gmail.com wrote:
be aware that google
Well i was going to for the original. But it being so out of date, i
thought i would just take the mercurial branch and use a tool to
convert the code and its branches with history to git. that way it is
exactly what is in the mercurial repos. But doing that i cant fork it.
i would need to create
I somebody wants to keep an official mirror there I have no
objection. I prefer to stick with mercurial on Google because
mercurial is 100% python.
On Apr 5, 1:53 am, elffikk elff...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I use a few project stored on github, and I find it easier to navigate
source code or to
32 matches
Mail list logo
