Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Something like this was already implemented 4 years ago when we write a compatibility layer between Django and web2py: http://web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/download/document.file.08621820-64d8-4db5-a85c-569a647a4437.py Perhaps you can take some of that code and re-adapt it. On Monday, 2

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Hello, About webpy example, I think this is readilly possible in web2py, I mean it just maybe a better way to structure your model declaration/defintion... Did you try it with web2py? Richard On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Carlos Cesar Caballero Díaz < desarro...@spicm.cfg.sld.cu> wrote: >

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Antony, thanks for your answer, there were some things I did not know you could do, but there is just a problem with: | db.define_table('review', Field('author'), Field('valuea','int'), Field('valueb','int'), Field('valuec','int'), Field('place','reference place')) defget_review_average(row):

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 12:21:53 PM UTC-5, Carlos Cesar Caballero wrote: > > Antony, thanks for your answer, there were some things I did not know you > could do, but there is just a problem with: > > db.define_table('review', >Field('author'), >Field('valuea', 'int'), >

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 9:50:34 AM UTC-5, Carlos Cesar Caballero wrote: > > ok, now is not so clean, the "functions" are before the "variables" > declarations, > In weppy, you have this (note the need for the @virtualfield decorator): class Review: author = Field() value =

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

I am building a plugin for use the weppy code in web2py, It seems to work, but need more coding and testing, I will upload it to github in a couple of minutes. Greetings. El 02/11/15 a las 10:02, Richard Vézina escribió: Hello, About webpy example, I think this is readilly possible in

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

The dal is a very good piece of software, and it can done practically everything that any orm can do, but in my opinion, the problem is not what we can do, but how we do it, for example, we have places, and the places have reviews, it will be something like this: db.define_table('review',

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 8:23:50 PM UTC-4, Vinicius Assef wrote: > > The best scenario I see is defining methods to model classes. > > For example, centralising queries and business actions like: > create_customer(), get_active_employees(), register_student() and so on. > If those are

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

The best scenario I see is defining methods to model classes. For example, centralising queries and business actions like: create_customer(), get_active_employees(), register_student() and so on. -- Vinicius Assef On 30 October 2015 at 12:49, Anthony wrote: > > Well,

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

> Well, the only thing that I really want right now, is a layer for object > oriented use, something like the weppy pyDAL layer should be enough, it > will be a impressive improvement to pydal (will convince to many users to > use pydal and web2py) > What are some examples of things you

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

We could use object oriented modeling, we could save our objects directly to the database, we could declare non persistent variables in objects, we could have a better code structure in our apps, we could maintain large models easily, we could reuse or extend model classes easily, we don't

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:10:29 PM UTC-4, Carlos Cesar Caballero wrote: > > We could use object oriented modeling, > Yes, but the question is, what exactly does that mean to you, and how would it improve things over the current DAL? Can you share a specific example, possibly including

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Hi Ramos, What's your project ? Because if you do some console, desktop or Python notebook doc. standalone pydal is there. But if you're looking at developing a web app or rest api Web2py Is quite good at it and quite well integrated with pydal ;) Or what inconvenience do you see with web2py

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

my inconvenients: 1 - Bootstrap, i need layout.html but dont want bootstrap. How do i get rid of bootstrap or change it to semantic ? Bootstrap should not be a constraint but just an add-on. 2 - web2py custom forms and tables. Are nice tools but if they dont do what you want you will have a

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Hey! Bootstrap was never a constraint, I am removing it from every single project and adding foundation/semantic/custom - I can't stand it. I am also manually writing forms (everything in between of form.custom.begin and form.custom.end) while using the power of SQLFORMs on backend. What do you

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 11:07:42 AM UTC-4, Ramos wrote: > > my inconvenients: > > 1 - Bootstrap, i need layout.html but dont want bootstrap. How do i get > rid of bootstrap or change it to semantic ? > Bootstrap should not be a constraint but just an add-on. > How would you do it

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

pyDAL is the choice. But if i use it outside web2py i need an alternative http server/rest endpoint and something to auth clients. What do you suggest to add to pyDAL ? Regards António 2015-10-22 14:56 GMT+01:00 António Ramos : > I agree with you except for the "kept

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

I agree with you except for the "kept secret" because it keeps away people that could help make it even better. and yes, i meant pyDAL 2015-10-22 14:53 GMT+01:00 Richard Vézina : > Do you mean pyDAL? > > If so, you have to consider that it is very young and may still

Re: [web2py] DAL alternatives

Do you mean pyDAL? If so, you have to consider that it is very young and may still seems to be web2py related which may make poeple think that they can't use it without web2py... I use to refer many StackOverflow asker to pyDAL as a way to solve their issue, I guess word of mouth is not in use