Re: [webkit-dev] If you like writing memory smashers, you'll love this

2014-12-16 Thread Mark Rowe
On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:47, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote: As of r177317, FastMalloc can be disabled at runtime. This means that you can use system memory analysis tools like GuardMalloc, MallocScribble, Instruments allocation tracking, leaks, and heap to debug memory issues in

Re: [webkit-dev] If you like writing memory smashers, you'll love this

2014-12-15 Thread Mark Rowe
On Dec 15, 2014, at 17:31, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote: As of r177317, FastMalloc can be disabled at runtime. This means that you can use system memory analysis tools like GuardMalloc, MallocScribble, Instruments allocation tracking, leaks, and heap to debug memory issues in

Re: [webkit-dev] Downtime for Bugzilla upgrade on Thursday, October 16 from 8-10 AM PDT

2014-10-17 Thread Mark Rowe
On Oct 17, 2014, at 03:52, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, On 2014-10-17 12:42, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: Could the format of bz emails be changed? The new one with those huge tables on top and tiny fonts for the bug comments are pretty difficult to process. You

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac WK1 EWS bots having issues

2014-08-15 Thread Mark Rowe
On Aug 15, 2014, at 02:10, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, it seems the Apple Mac WK1 EWS bots have problems: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/queue-status/mac-ews Last Pass: 11 hours, 57 minutes ago by webkit-ews-01 Unable to pass tests without patch (tree is red?)

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac WK1 EWS bots having issues

2014-08-15 Thread Mark Rowe
On Aug 15, 2014, at 09:22, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Aug 15, 2014, at 02:10, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu mailto:o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, it seems the Apple Mac WK1 EWS bots have problems: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/queue-status/mac-ews http

Re: [webkit-dev] FeatureDefines.h and .xcconfig

2014-08-07 Thread Mark Rowe
On Aug 7, 2014, at 09:36, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Dean Jackson d...@apple.com wrote: Hi floks, Things are a bit confusing in the OS X and iOS build configurations because we have both a FeatureDefines.h and a set of .xcconfig files, often

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 19, 2014, at 13:09, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: Hey everyone, When guarding code with macros that are always defined, such as ASSERT_DISABLED (it's always either 0 or 1), we have a choice between: if (!ASSERT_DISABLED) { // do things } and:

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 20, 2014, at 13:08, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2014, at 13:09, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: Hey everyone, When guarding code with macros that are always defined

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 19, 2014, at 13:36, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: Here are some examples. Guarding a loop that does assertions: if (!ASSERT_DISABLED) { for (unsigned index = 0; index m_generationInfo.size(); ++index) { GenerationInfo info = m_generationInfo[index];

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 20, 2014, at 13:19, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2014, at 13:08, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2014, at 13:09, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: Hey everyone, When

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 20, 2014, at 14:02, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: The #if means that the code being guarded isn't indented. I believe that indenting control flow is a good idea. Also, using normal if's whenever it would compile and be semantically equivalent means that the code being

Re: [webkit-dev] Style proposal for branch style for macros

2014-04-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 20, 2014, at 14:50, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2014, at 14:02, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: The #if means that the code being guarded isn't indented. I believe that indenting control

Re: [webkit-dev] Support for 10.8.5

2014-04-06 Thread Mark Rowe
On Apr 6, 2014, at 4:07, Rüdiger Cordes r...@opelgt.org wrote: Hello list, with Webkit r164187 the support of 10.8.5 is dropped. What is the reason for incompatibility? If you’re seeing a problem with building or running on OS X 10.8.5, please file a bug report and provide details

Re: [webkit-dev] *.webkit.org downtime Tuesday, 3/11

2014-03-12 Thread Mark Rowe
I’ve just fixed both trac.webkit.org and git.webkit.org. Please let us know if you notice any further issues. Thanks, - Mark On Mar 11, 2014, at 23:53, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Additionally git.webkit.org is stucked too on r165452. Osztrogonác Csaba írta: Hi,

Re: [webkit-dev] How did Apple build libicucore.dylib?

2014-01-20 Thread Mark Rowe
Moving webkit-dev to BCC since this is off-topic for the list. On Jan 10, 2014, at 13:45, Eric Wing ewmail...@gmail.com wrote: (I tried webkit-help but didn't get any responses, so I thought maybe this list might be more appropriate for this question. Sorry for the duplicate if otherwise.)

Re: [webkit-dev] Minimum supported Xcode version is changing

2013-09-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-09-20, at 12:59 PM, Bem Jones-Bey bjone...@adobe.com wrote: Did you fix it so that the build works on Mountain Lion when running Xcode 5? As of yesterday, the tree didn't build on Mountain Lion with Xcode 5, with the following linker error: Undefined symbols for architecture

[webkit-dev] Minimum supported Xcode version is changing

2013-09-20 Thread Mark Rowe
Hi all, Just a friendly heads-up that the minimum supported Xcode version will be increasing to Xcode 4.6 later today. We’re doing this to ensure that WebKit is building with a compiler toolchain that supports all of the modern C++ features we care about. Xcode 4.6 has been available for

Re: [webkit-dev] Minimum supported Xcode version is changing

2013-09-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-09-20, at 1:01 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2013-09-20, at 12:59 PM, Bem Jones-Bey bjone...@adobe.com wrote: Did you fix it so that the build works on Mountain Lion when running Xcode 5? As of yesterday, the tree didn't build on Mountain Lion with Xcode 5

Re: [webkit-dev] ChangeLog format

2013-08-22 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-08-21, at 11:11 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org wrote: I see, I thought ChangeLog parser was used everywhere. So, I guess the solution would be to find a format most people like and adapt all scripts to it. I personally think it's not worth it, though. The oneline git

Re: [webkit-dev] ChangeLog format

2013-08-22 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-08-22, at 12:46 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org wrote: El jue, 22-08-2013 a las 00:41 -0700, Mark Rowe escribió: On 2013-08-21, at 11:11 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org wrote: I see, I thought ChangeLog parser was used everywhere. So, I guess the solution

Re: [webkit-dev] Upcoming changes to WebKit's logging functionality

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-08-02, at 4:39 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: As part of improving WebKit's logging subsystem on OS X (https://webkit.org/b/119031) I'm refactoring the code in WebCore, WebKit and WebKit2 that initializes logging channels. I'm doing this to reduce the need to touch several

Re: [webkit-dev] Mavericks Nightly

2013-06-19 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-06-19, at 10:12 AM, Mark Gilbert web...@gallery.co.uk wrote: Hi Folks. Any news on when we can get a nightly build to run on Mavericks ? After it is released. - Mark ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Enabling new features in WebKit + prefixing

2013-05-12 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-05-04, at 15:32, Dean Jackson d...@apple.com wrote: This is a brief summary of yesterday's discussion at the contributors' meeting. If there is no strong disagreement here then I'll add this to the wiki. New Features - The rule of sending an email to webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Intent to Enable CSS Exclusions in Nightlies

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-05-09, at 17:21, Bear Travis betra...@adobe.com wrote: Hi WebKit, The CSS Exclusions Shapes [1] feature is currently behind a runtime flag that I would like to enable by default in the WebKit nightlies. Can you clarify what it means to enable something by default in the WebKit

Re: [webkit-dev] Intent to Enable CSS Exclusions in Nightlies

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Rowe
: Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 5:25 PM To: Adobe betra...@adobe.com Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Intent to Enable CSS Exclusions in Nightlies On 2013-05-09, at 17:21, Bear Travis betra...@adobe.com wrote: Hi

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildsystem cleanup

2013-04-08 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-04-08, at 15:44, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote: Am 08.04.2013 um 21:26 schrieb Roger Fong: Unfortunately this would cause a lot of complication in our internal build setup that we currently don’t really have the resources to deal with right now. Please don't get

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildsystem cleanup

2013-04-08 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-04-08, at 17:16, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote: Am 09.04.2013 um 00:58 schrieb Mark Rowe: On 2013-04-08, at 15:44, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote: Am 08.04.2013 um 21:26 schrieb Roger Fong: Unfortunately this would cause a lot of complication in our

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildsystem cleanup

2013-04-08 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-04-08, at 17:45, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote: Am 09.04.2013 um 02:29 schrieb Mark Rowe: On 2013-04-08, at 17:16, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com wrote: Am 09.04.2013 um 00:58 schrieb Mark Rowe: On 2013-04-08, at 15:44, Patrick Gansterer par

Re: [webkit-dev] How to report iOS UIWebView WebKit issues

2013-04-03 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-04-03, at 03:51, Mustafizur Rahaman mustaf.h...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am developing an application using UIWebView on iPad I am seeing couple of WebCore (element style related) crashes. The crashes happens randomly (yet to narrow it down to exact use case), but the call

Re: [webkit-dev] Compiling WebKit up to 25% faster in Windows?

2013-03-26 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-03-26, at 11:37, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Bratell brat...@opera.com wrote: Is this something that has been talked about in the past, and would you be interested in replacing the long list of directories to search for every

Re: [webkit-dev] 32-bit WebKit Nighly build APPLICATION ?

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-03-01, at 11:48, Mark Gilbert web...@gallery.co.uk wrote: Hi Folks. Does anyone know if the WebKit Nightly build app is / can be built as a 32-bit capable binary app ? I note that forcing WebKit to start up in 32-bit mode throws an error - relating to a path in the

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org is down?

2013-02-16 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-02-16, at 00:12, Christophe Dumez - SISA ch.du...@sisa.samsung.com wrote: build.webkit.org appears to be down: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/build.webkit.org I’ve fixed it. - Mark ___ webkit-dev mailing list

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-02-07 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-02-03, at 21:20, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I should mention that there's a lot of interest right now at Apple in the possibility of switching to Gyp. I’ve filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109248 to track initial work in getting gyp set up for the Mac

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-02-04 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-02-04, at 10:57, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote: GYP was written in Python to address point (b). Python was already part of the baseline requirements on all platforms, so we already had Python available

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-01-30, at 17:14, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote: Thanks for

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-01-31, at 00:48, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: I would consider changing or improving gyp's syntax to be on the table if it was needed to reach the goal. For what it’s worth, I also find the gyp syntax to be unpleasant. It feels as though it was optimized for being processed

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-01-31, at 00:59, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2013-01-31, at 00:48, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: I would consider changing or improving gyp's syntax to be on the table if it was needed

Re: [webkit-dev] Common build system (was Re: WebKit Wishes)

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2013-01-31, at 01:07, Hajime Morrita morr...@chromium.org wrote: In my understanding, it doesn't matter whether Apple Mac port supports ninja or not. We could use GNU make if some meta-build system is adopted because Mac OS has it installed. The problem here is that the neither CMake and

Re: [webkit-dev] Rolling out a patch requires a justification beyond a test failure in downstream projects

2012-12-11 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-12-11, at 19:34, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote: Do you have an example of when this has occurred? It's good to have examples if we want to prevent this in the future. Yes. I'd rather not publicly

Re: [webkit-dev] Behaviour of CapsLock in WebKit/Mac

2012-12-11 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-12-11, at 21:24, Wez w...@chromium.org wrote: Hi all, There's a bug reported against Chromium (crbug.com/144757) for the CapsLock key generating only a keydown when first pressed and released, and a keyup when next pressed and released, i.e. the keydown keyup events correspond

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-21 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-21, at 02:25, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: and again ... I poked the server to work around the issue. I may have also tracked down the root cause of these issues too. I've sent Bill details of my theory, so hopefully we can come up with a permanent solution to it

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for coding guidelines: Do not use fall-through switch cases inside #ifdef's

2012-08-21 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-21, at 13:02, Bruno Abinader brunoabina...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Tim Horton timothy_hor...@apple.com wrote: Without looking at the code, I vaguely think that CSSPropertyWebkitTextDecorationLine comes from a generated file that might not rebuild when

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-18 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-18, at 07:54, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, ... and again and again ... Bill, Mark or Lucas, could you check it, please? Have you got any idea why does it happen regularly? Bill is back from vacation next week and will look in to the underlying cause of the

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-09, at 02:41, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit.org is unavailable again. :( Could you check it, please? This is caused by a problem on a host that I don't have sufficient privileges on to be able to address the issue myself. I've

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-09, at 03:14, Peter Beverloo pe...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-08-09, at 02:41, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit.org is unavailable again. :( Could you check

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-09, at 04:22, Peter Beverloo pe...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-08-09, at 03:14, Peter Beverloo pe...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-08-09, at 02:41

Re: [webkit-dev] bugs.webkit.org and trac.webkit org down?

2012-08-07 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-08-07, at 10:55, Sravan sra1sand...@gmail.com wrote: I am still seeing the problem(ofcourse, Sunnyvale, CA) ? any one, when this will be up? This should be fixed now. Part of the database infrastructure (pgpool) was timing out all new connections. This caused all of the services

Re: [webkit-dev] build time - lion vs mountain lion - 200% slowdown

2012-07-27 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-07-27, at 13:33, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote: Just upgraded from Lion to Mountain Lion (and XCode 4.4). Clean build time went from 29mins to 1h 29mins on a new 2.6GHz 16GB MacBook Pro 15 Retina. You might want to hold off on an upgrade unless you enjoy waiting for builds.

Re: [webkit-dev] Building on Mountain Lion

2012-07-25 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-07-25, at 14:15, Jacob Goldstein jac...@adobe.com wrote: Has any tried to build WebKit on Mountain Lion? I just attempted with a new install of Mountain Lion and Xcode 4.4 and the build keeps failing while trying to compile AlternativeTextUIController. If anyone has thoughts

Re: [webkit-dev] Removing BUILDING_ON / TARGETING macros in favor of system availability macros

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-07-10, at 16:24, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: I'm open to feedback on this proposal, but I'd like to move forward with this change in the next day or two if no one objects. Given the lack of outcry I've posted patches on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91015 that make

Re: [webkit-dev] Removing BUILDING_ON / TARGETING macros in favor of system availability macros

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Rowe
of the checks within WebKit care about, and that concept is quite easy to understand. Thanks for taking the time to look this over! - Mark On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: I would like to propose removing the BUILDING_ON and TARGETING family of macros

[webkit-dev] Removing BUILDING_ON / TARGETING macros in favor of system availability macros

2012-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
I would like to propose removing the BUILDING_ON and TARGETING family of macros that are used to build code conditionally for different versions of OS X. I propose this in order to address several problems: The checks are verbose, and getting worse. For instance, in order to write code

Re: [webkit-dev] Configuring for Clang

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-06-27, at 01:52, Mark Gilbert web...@gallery.co.uk wrote: Hi Folks. I have been trying for weeks to build WebKit in 32-bit. My system is a MacMini Server with 10.7.4 and latest XCode. I update via SVN then use build-webkit. This creates a good working 64bit version.

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down?

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-06-21, at 15:46, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote: I'd like to see a 'test' buildbot up and running that we could use as a staging area for trying out new changes before deploying to the production server. We could copy

Re: [webkit-dev] Debugging With Xcode

2012-04-23 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-04-23, at 18:02, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Does anyone still debug WebKit on Mac OS X with Xcode 4? 1. I don't know how to actually set up Xcode to point to WebKitBuild like it used to. http://www.webkit.org/building/debug.html Mentions a Legacy option which does not

Re: [webkit-dev] CMake for Apple's Windows port

2012-04-18 Thread Mark Rowe
at http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WinCE#Build and http://www.webkit.org/building/tools.html (but without cygwin). Am 12.04.2012 um 23:47 schrieb Mark Rowe: On 2012-04-12, at 14:28, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: Interesting. Can you comment further on why this is needed, instead

Re: [webkit-dev] CMake for Apple's Windows port

2012-04-12 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-04-12, at 12:08, Adam Treat atr...@rim.com wrote: If my memory serves me the problem was that Apple couldn't figure out how to get cmake installed on the Apple build system machine. It has little to do with installing software and everything to do with the complexity involved in

Re: [webkit-dev] CMake for Apple's Windows port

2012-04-12 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-04-12, at 14:28, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Apr 12, 2012 1:17 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-04-12, at 12:08, Adam Treat atr...@rim.com wrote: If my memory serves me the problem was that Apple couldn't figure out how to get cmake installed

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-09, at 10:23, Gustavo Noronha Silva g...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 19:39 -0300, Alexis Menard wrote: To svn user : - Conflict resolving much easier and performant than svn (we have drivers for changelogs and the default one are much better than svn). - Local

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-09, at 09:15, Kalle Vahlman kalle.vahl...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/3/9 Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org: On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Ashod Nakashian ashodnakash...@yahoo.com wrote: I think if we address the main issues raised by the svn users, the current consensus (if

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-09 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-09, at 07:14, Ashod Nakashian ashodnakash...@yahoo.com wrote: From: David Barr davidb...@google.com To: Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 2:37 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [webkit-dev] Error while building on Mac SL 10.6.6

2012-03-02 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-02, at 15:45, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Building from snapshots is not supported. Huh? - Mark ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Error while building on Mac SL 10.6.6

2012-03-02 Thread Mark Rowe
that people can build a revision that is known to compile (on at least a subset of platforms) from source. - Mark On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-03-02, at 15:45, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Building from snapshots is not supported. Huh

Re: [webkit-dev] Error while building on Mac SL 10.6.6

2012-03-02 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-02, at 15:44, Vivek Galatage vivekgalat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Webkit, I am trying to build nightly snapshot @rev r109209 on mac SL 10.6.6 with xcode 3.2.6 installed. But when I issue build-webkit from command line I am running into various errors. I am attaching the log

Re: [webkit-dev] svn.webkit.org

2012-03-01 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-01, at 03:37, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi All, To avoid overloading svn.webkit.org again and again with zillion svn checkout after rm -rf-ed working copies on the bots, I stopped all of our clobbered buildbot. After unbanning our network, I'll copy a

Re: [webkit-dev] svn.webkit.org

2012-03-01 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-03-01, at 04:28, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Mark Rowe írta: On 2012-03-01, at 03:37, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: After unbanning our network, I'll copy a locally tar-ed WebKit-svn copy to all bots and then restart them one by one not to overload

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

2012-02-29 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote: build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. Thanks for your patience! For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone actually made build.webkit.org substantially slower. After profiling

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

2012-02-29 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler lforsch...@apple.com wrote: build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. Thanks for your patience

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore

2012-02-28 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-02-28, at 07:38, Osztrogonac Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi, I uploaded the necessary buildfix for Qt to the bugzilla: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79783 . Please be careful with moving JavaScriptCore/wtf to WTF, because we need zillion trivial fixes for case

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore

2012-02-28 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2012-02-28, at 17:11, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: I'm fine with Source/wtf. Very easy to implement. I think this has the potential to cause problems. It would lead to adding the Source directory to the header search path for some build systems, which would cause all sorts of

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore

2012-02-27 Thread Mark Rowe
This will require some coordination to ensure that it doesn't break Apple's internal builds. It would be great if you could post a patch ahead of time so that we have some time to test and prepare for the changes on our side. Thanks, - Mark On 2012-02-27, at 15:27, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore

2012-02-27 Thread Mark Rowe
! I'll email this list with a link to the patch. Thanks! - Mark On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: This will require some coordination to ensure that it doesn't break Apple's internal builds. It would be great if you could post a patch ahead of time so that we

Re: [webkit-dev] Hanging builds

2011-11-30 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-11-29, at 10:00, Adam Roben wrote: On Nov 28, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Adam Roben wrote: On Nov 26, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote: Good morning WebKit folks, I'm looking at build.webkit.org/waterfall, and see several bots which are idle, but still report building 1min

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore (revisited)

2011-11-04 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-11-04, at 10:57, Kevin Ollivier wrote: Hi Steve, On Nov 4, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Steve Falkenburg wrote: On Nov 4, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Kevin Ollivier wrote: Step (2) here involves coming up with a good solution for export control in both the WTF and platform cases. Today we use

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore (revisited)

2011-11-04 Thread Mark Rowe
at Apple)? I'm also happy to attempt webkit.org side of that change if you'd prefer, but I suspect you know better what the contrains are. Yup, it's on my list. - Mark On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore (revisited)

2011-11-02 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-11-02, at 13:23, Adam Barth wrote: As discussed previously, I think it would benefit the project to move WTF out of JavaScriptCore: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2010-December/015427.html https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2011-February/015940.html

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore (revisited)

2011-11-02 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-11-02, at 16:32, Adam Barth wrote: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-11-02, at 13:23, Adam Barth wrote: As discussed previously, I think it would benefit the project to move WTF out of JavaScriptCore: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving WTF out of JavaScriptCore (revisited)

2011-11-02 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-11-02, at 16:42, Darin Adler wrote: On Nov 2, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: There are a few related goals here that I'm aware of: a) Separate WTF out of JavaScriptCore since it doesn't logically belong there, but was simply a convenient home for it. b) Separate WebCore

Re: [webkit-dev] How does a *Prefix.h work on other platforms?

2011-09-07 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-09-07, at 21:22, Xianzhu Wang (王显著) wrote: Hi, There are some *Prefix.h files that I guess are injected as header files into *.cpp files when compiling with xcode. I guess on other platforms they are just no use and the source files should include all necessary header files,

Re: [webkit-dev] Snow Leopard Leaks Bot out of Disk Space

2011-08-08 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-08-08, at 17:16, Eric Seidel wrote: http://build.webkit.org/builders/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Leaks/builds/18482/steps/layout-test/logs/stdio 2011-08-08 16:03:36,710 67413 manager.py:1403 ERROR worker/0 raised OSError('[Errno 28] No space left on device:

Re: [webkit-dev] Time for the next 32bit hack?

2011-07-20 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-20, at 00:35, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote: Good morning fellow WebKit crowd, Leopard fails to link since a while. Ld /Volumes/Big/WebKit-BuildSlave/leopard-intel-release/build/WebKitBuild/Release/WebCore.framework/Versions/A/WebCore normal i386 cd

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-10, at 10:52, Adam Barth wrote: Hi webkit-dev, In trying to understand how our LayoutTest results system works, I've created a digram of the fallback graph among the various platform-specific directories:

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-10, at 12:46, Adam Barth wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-07-10, at 10:52, Adam Barth wrote: Hi webkit-dev, In trying to understand how our LayoutTest results system works, I've created a digram of the fallback graph among

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-10, at 13:20, Adam Barth wrote: Sure. I'll highlight the relevant section of my original email: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: These changes have the following virtues: A) The resulting fallback graph will be a tree, making the fallback

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On Jul 10, 2011, at 13:57, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-07-10, at 13:20, Adam Barth wrote: Sure. I'll highlight the relevant section of my original email: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Adam Barth aba

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On Jul 10, 2011, at 14:27, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Jul 10, 2011, at 13:57, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-07-10, at 13:20, Adam Barth

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
We seem to be talking past one another. Why are there two edges originating at win, but not mac-leopard? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2011, at 15:23, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On Jul 10, 2011, at 14:27, Adam Barth

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
of the reasons the fallback graph is not a tree. Adam On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: We seem to be talking past one another. Why are there two edges originating at win, but not mac-leopard? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2011, at 15:23, Adam Barth aba

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-10, at 17:54, Adam Barth wrote: Yes. As I said before: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: Being a tree is a global property, not a local property. There are two edges emanating from win. In order for the graph to be a tree one of them must

Re: [webkit-dev] LayoutTests results fallback graph

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-07-10, at 18:21, Adam Barth wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-07-10, at 17:54, Adam Barth wrote: Yes. As I said before: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: Being a tree is a global property

Re: [webkit-dev] The WebKit2 bot is failing 100% of the tests

2011-07-01 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-06-30, at 23:51, Adam Barth wrote: The WebKit2 bot seems to be failing 100% of the tests: http://build.webkit.org/waterfall?show=SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(WebKit2%20Tests) The regression range appears to be the following:

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal: Commit messages should start with a one-line summary of the change

2011-06-30 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-06-30, at 13:28, Adam Roben wrote: I'd like to propose that WebKit commit messages start with a one-line summary of the change. This change would have two benefits: 1) It would make it much easier to understand at a glance what the change actually does. Our commit logs

Re: [webkit-dev] Tiger

2011-05-03 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-05-03, at 10:58, Eric Seidel wrote: It looks like Tiger support in WebKit is slowly being removed. There no longer is a libWebKitSystemInterfaceTiger.a in the project, nor is there a Tiger buildbot or tiger expectations. Can we go ahead and kill all the ifdefs too? Or is it too

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit blog post proposal: Remote debugging with Web Inspector.

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Rowe
This seems rather Chrome-centric for a webkit.org blog post. - Mark On 2011-04-30, at 01:55, Pavel Feldman wrote: An update. Pavel WebKit Remote Debugging Posted by Pavel Feldman on Saturday, April 30th, 2011 at 1:53 am As you might know, WebKit Web Inspector (aka Chrome Developer

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit blog post proposal: Remote debugging with Web Inspector.

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-04-30, at 22:11, Pavel Feldman wrote: I see. It might be unfortunate branding, but the large amount of Web Inspector users refer to it as Developer Tools. We use every opportunity to tell users that it is the same thing, but this is not enough. The first question we always get is

Re: [webkit-dev] OSX 64 bit plugin support not ready

2011-04-26 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-04-26, at 05:11, Alan Swartz wrote: That's good to know. It's not the support of the Cocoa event model and CoreGraphics that appears broken, it's that the code that checks these options appears to be compiled out by the NP_NO_CARBON #define for 64 bit builds in PlugInViewMac.mm.

Re: [webkit-dev] UA string changes blog draft

2011-03-25 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-03-25, at 12:07, Peter Kasting wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: I've incorporated all the existing feedback into the draft. Feel free to take another look. Since some folks seem to be unable to see the draft even while logged in,

Re: [webkit-dev] UA string changes blog draft

2011-03-25 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-03-25, at 12:56, Peter Kasting wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: Is there some reason why these examples use manufactured Safari build numbers? It's implausible that a version of Safari with a build number of 534.24 would ever claim

Re: [webkit-dev] Build system update

2011-03-23 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-03-22, at 23:50, Adam Barth wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-03-22, at 19:16, Adam Barth wrote: WebKit-folk, With a bunch of help from Dimitri and Eric, we now have a functioning GYP-based build for the Apple Mac port

Re: [webkit-dev] Build system update

2011-03-23 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2011-03-23, at 03:33, Adam Barth wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: On 2011-03-22, at 23:50, Adam Barth wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote: Product names for targets are redundantly declared in the Xcode project

  1   2   3   4   >