[webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Philippe Normand
Hi, The patch to be landed soon for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45101 updates the apache config to require mod_bw. Can the buildbots admins please install it? I contacted the GTK+ bots admins already. The new test on this patch requires connection throttling but will run only on the

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Seidel
If you find a way to auto-install/auto-download the module as part of run-webkit-tests that's fine. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: This is a bad idea.  Please don't do this. Unless mod_bw comes installed in a normal Apache distribution, you're asking that

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 01:52 -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: This is a bad idea. Please don't do this. Unless mod_bw comes installed in a normal Apache distribution, you're asking that *every* webkit developer install mod_bw in order to run the layout tests. We already ask them to install python,

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Philippe Normand
Having said that, it just struck me that we have a few php scripts that are used by tests to cause intentional delays[0]. Perhaps we could use a similar pattern for this case too, and avoid this new requirement. Thanks for the hint Gustavo :) Actually I found video-throttled-load.cgi which

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Seidel
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Eric Seidel esei...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva g...@gnome.org wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 01:52 -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: This is a bad idea.  Please don't do this. Unless mod_bw comes installed in a normal Apache

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Evan Martin
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva g...@gnome.org wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 01:52 -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: This is a bad idea.  Please don't do this. Unless mod_bw comes installed in a normal Apache distribution, you're asking that *every* webkit developer install

Re: [webkit-dev] Buildbots soon to require apache mod_bw

2010-11-05 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 08:19 -0700, Evan Martin wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva g...@gnome.org wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 01:52 -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: This is a bad idea. Please don't do this. Unless mod_bw comes installed in a normal Apache distribution,

Re: [webkit-dev] W3C Proposal: User Interface Independence for Accessible Rich Internet Applications

2010-11-05 Thread James Robinson
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, James Craig jcr...@apple.com wrote: Ojan Vafai wrote: How is [ DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent ] any different than DOMAttrModified? The spec claims it doesn't have the problems that DOMAttrModified has, but I don't see how that's the case. DOMAttrModified

Re: [webkit-dev] W3C Proposal: User Interface Independence for Accessible Rich Internet Applications

2010-11-05 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:40 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, James Craig jcr...@apple.com wrote: Ojan Vafai wrote: How is [ DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent ] any different than DOMAttrModified? The spec claims it doesn't have the problems that