Currently, Samsung developers are trying to make better EFL port.
So, we are trying to contribute our patches to trunk.
But, I think there is no efl special reviewers yet. Whenever we make a
patch,
we have requested to review to other reviewer(Kenneth, Antonio, tkent,
eric, abarth and so on)
and
Even though patches are necessary, it seems to me some EFL patches aren't
necessary.
I will consider if patch is necessary whenever I make(or review internally)
a patch.
- Gyuyoung
(I think part of the trouble is that it seems the EFL port is trying to do
too much in WebKit. I'm not sure
I think the WebKit/EFL patches are 100% valuable to be submitted to
WebKit.org. ProFusion and Samsung are doing a great job improving the port,
and we should not discourage them to keep contributing.
I've been rubber-stamping and reviewing their contributions as much as I
can, and I have to agree
-- Forwarded message --
From: pattin xyts...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/4/9
Subject: re： Dropping support for WML?
To: Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
Hi,
I do not know whether there are other companies in the use of WML. I just
personally try to open the WML to use, found that it is not
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gyuyoung Kim gyuyoung@samsung.com
Date: 2011/4/10
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] webkit-dev Digest, Vol 71, Issue 8
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Cc: Krzysztof Czech k.cz...@samsung.com, 임상석 sangseok@samsung.com
I know Samsung is using the
I will do my best and thank you for your review again.
- Gyuyoung
From: Antonio Gomes [mailto:toniki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:52 PM
To: Gyuyoung Kim
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org; 임상석
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Who are the EFL reviewers?
I think the WebKit/EFL patches
I have a related question - what sort of test coverage is there for WML
currently on the core bots? Do any of the core bots compile with WML
enabled? I've made and reviewed a few changes to WML code made parallel to
changes to the HTML forms code in the past and have made the WML edits
7 matches
Mail list logo
