Re: [webkit-dev] Question on Inline element

2011-05-18 Thread Mustafizur Rahaman
You can see that the img overflows the paragraph in both Firefox and WebKit. This seems to be caused by the align=left, which I believe implies the CSS style float: left;. I suspect that floats do not get counted towards the height of a block, but I'd have to check. I suspect that if we

Re: [webkit-dev] Question on Inline element

2011-05-18 Thread Eric Seidel
I still don't understand the problem here? The bug you mentioned was marked invalid. As far as I can tell our current float behavior is correct. -eric On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Mustafizur Rahaman mustaf.h...@gmail.comwrote: You can see that the img overflows the paragraph in both

[webkit-dev] Why vendor-specific attributes in CSS3 parsing engine?

2011-05-18 Thread Sabri Aurrelia
Why does webkit not provide support for native CSS3 attributes in its parsing engine where those attributes clearly coincide with most other browsers' attributes -and- the Candidate Recommendations set forth by W3? Let me put it this way: What is the purpose of every browser having their own

Re: [webkit-dev] Why vendor-specific attributes in CSS3 parsing engine?

2011-05-18 Thread Simon Fraser
On May 18, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Sabri Aurrelia wrote: Why does webkit not provide support for native CSS3 attributes in its parsing engine where those attributes clearly coincide with most other browsers' attributes -and- the Candidate Recommendations set forth by W3? Let me put it this way:

Re: [webkit-dev] Why vendor-specific attributes in CSS3 parsing engine?

2011-05-18 Thread Brady Duga
Though, in this case, the spec is at CR and has been since 2009. Is there an additional process to removing the vendor prefixes for WebKit? So, are they still there because no one bothered to remove them, or because the consensus is they should remain for some reason? --Brady On Wed, May 18,

Re: [webkit-dev] Why vendor-specific attributes in CSS3 parsing engine?

2011-05-18 Thread Simon Fraser
The best way to move forward would be to file a bug requesting that the prefixes be removed. Simon On May 18, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Brady Duga wrote: Though, in this case, the spec is at CR and has been since 2009. Is there an additional process to removing the vendor prefixes for WebKit? So,

[webkit-dev] Large Source Reorganizations By External WebKit Ports

2011-05-18 Thread Brent Fulgham
I've recently been spending some time reviewing some of the WebKit port that are not part of the core WebKit archive. Electronic Arts, for example, has been very good about making source dumps of their build of WebKit available (wow -- WebKit on the PS3! :), Playo has released their sources, and

Re: [webkit-dev] JavascriptCore and Multiple Threads

2011-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Garen
Hi Martijn. i selected JavascriptCore over the competition because i read that it's thread safe. Yes, with certain restrictions, JavaScriptCore can be used concurrently on multiple threads. but, i can't get it to work from within threads with crashing. It's hard to diagnose exactly what's

Re: [webkit-dev] Large Source Reorganizations By External WebKit Ports

2011-05-18 Thread Peter Kasting
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@webkit.org wrote: Google used this same approach with their Chromium port, the side effects of which find us in year two (or three?) of the effort to merge those changes back into the core WebKit archive. Um, what? The Chromium port

Re: [webkit-dev] Large Source Reorganizations By External WebKit Ports

2011-05-18 Thread Brent Fulgham
Hi Peter, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: Google used this same approach with their Chromium port, the side effects of which find us in year two (or three?) of the effort to merge those changes back into the core WebKit archive. Um, what?  The

Re: [webkit-dev] Large Source Reorganizations By External WebKit Ports

2011-05-18 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: Google used this same approach with their Chromium port, the side effects of which find us in year two (or three?) of the effort to

Re: [webkit-dev] Large Source Reorganizations By External WebKit Ports

2011-05-18 Thread Darin Fisher
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: Google used this same approach with their Chromium port, the

Re: [webkit-dev] Why vendor-specific attributes in CSS3 parsing engine?

2011-05-18 Thread Brady Duga
Done: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61096 On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.comwrote: The best way to move forward would be to file a bug requesting that the prefixes be removed. Simon On May 18, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Brady Duga wrote: Though, in

Re: [webkit-dev] EFL builder is sick

2011-05-18 Thread Gyuyoung Kim
Hello Geoff, Thank you for your bug filing. I fixed it yesterday. Thanks, gyuyoung Hi folks. The EFL builder is sick. I've filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61018 explaining how to fix it, but I'm just not familiar enough with the EFL build system to do so myself. If

[webkit-dev] Fwd: [whatwg] More HTML Editing Commands questions

2011-05-18 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Is this a bug? -- Forwarded message -- From: Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu Date: Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] More HTML Editing Commands questions To: wha...@lists.whatwg.org On 5/18/11 6:57 PM, Tim Down wrote: On 18 May 2011 19:32, Aryeh